GM Nostr ☕

The war on Bitcoin/crypto usage has been stepped up significantly in recent weeks.

What are your thoughts?

Are you working out a new strategy?

Supporting the tools that are still working?

Think everything will just 'blow over'?

Have a good one 🧡⚡

Barefoot driving is the best way to drive (normal cars)

The biggest issue with commies is that they don't just want to be poor alone, they want to make everyone poor with them.

What are the must have apps on Graphene ?👀

Statism is the most dangerous religion.

Shill me examples of things or entities that are not capable of transmitting money 👇

Use #Obtainium to manage many apps using this technique in a simple GUI. Updates are handled too.

If you upload a picture or video to a social media, do you expect geolocation and other metadata to be stripped?

#blossom

GM Nostr ☕

NGL, this is likely the shittiest week I've ever had in Bitcoin. Feeling pretty dispondent about Bitcoin as usable money, especially in the short term.

Bitcoin privacy took a monumental blow this week.

Hope you're all good 🧡

🧡

Agree with the first paragraph. But still don’t see how the comparison in the second has any weight.

There is nothing holding the “consensus” of ordinals together.

This issue isn’t about whether something is “consensus valid” or not, it’s about the degree of assurance of the *consensus system itself.*

So yes, ordinals have their own consensus, just like my HOA, just like a game of Dungeons and Dragons, just like you can buy a plot of land on the moon, and just like #Bitcoin.

But I’m saying that to treat all of these *very different* consensus models as exactly the same is simply not a useful (or accurate) framing.

Agree with the first paragraph. But still don’t see how the comparison in the second has any weight.

There is nothing holding the “consensus” of ordinals together.

This issue isn’t about whether something is “consensus valid” or not, it’s about the degree of assurance of the *consensus system itself.*

So yes, ordinals have their own consensus, just like my HOA, just like a game of Dungeons and Dragons, just like you can buy a plot of land on the moon, and just like #Bitcoin.

But I’m saying that to treat all of these *very different* consensus models as exactly the same is simply not a useful (or accurate) framing.

me to ants:

If my guess is right, small miners build shares, and when that number crosses a threshold the pool includes the miner in the block reward. That would make sense to me.

We never custody, but you're right below the threshold wouldn't be paid yet.

However, a huge reward like this is going to push many more past that threshold