Avatar
Energy Producer
6eea1ae1e3d9c17c749adaa3ea433bc22fe2ebe7add0ab481bb03dd8002c9717
I stack therefore I am

Depends on your total stack, risk tolerance, and understanding of what Strategy is doing. Ultimately if you understand MSTR is going after a $300T market by crafting fixed income products for various pools of capital, in order to buy more bitcoin, you might see they are growing on a btc/share basis and therefore it makes sense they could beat a benchmark against BTC while the asset monetizes. This requires lots of work on top of the work to understand BTC. Other benefits too but it introduces counter party risk so hence not a singular answer.

Thank you!! Also you should set up a wallet, id have zapped you!

Any good bitcoin books for kids recommendations? #asknostr

It’s not fossil vs renewables it’s all of the above, intermittent is just as important as max capacity. Alex Epstein and Chris Wright are wrong and the market will prove this so I don’t really care but what is NOSTR for if not to yell contrarian opinions into the void.

“Energy Secretary Chris Wright on Monday morning seemed to brush off warnings about the loss of generation capacity amid soaring demand.

"The more we load our grid with intermittent generation, the worse the grid performs during times of maximum demand," he posted on the social media platform. "The One Big Beautiful Bill will help end wasteful subsidies and deliver more reliable energy for the American people!"

In Texas, however, grid operator ERCOT said at its Board of Directors meeting last week that the state of the grid is strong, opens new tab and "ready for the challenges of extreme weather” this summer because of the new generation that has come online, and cited new large-scale solar energy and battery storage.”

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/us-senate-bills-clean-energy-cuts-draw-backlash-labor-business-2025-06-30/

Add a wallet so you can receive zaps for your hard work!

Absolutely agree and I didn’t mean to be appearing to defend any aspect of communism - and in a fair legal framework no question only one owner. The work itself has value independent of the legal framework though.

You may possess it, own it under a legal framework, and even may have designed it, but it will always be an example of his craftsmanship

Dotcom was just bad valuations due to opaque information. MSTR has been very transparent with BTC acquisition fund raising information.

If you don’t understand capital pools, fund charters and their inherent restrictions, then I’m guessing you think MSTR and 21 are scams.