I'm about at the end of my rope with AT&T.
When my wife and I got married, the priest that married us preached this:
He said that, rather than two people turned inward toward each other, Christian marriage is two people side-by-side turned toward God.
I don't remember the rest of his sermon, but I think that is enough to ponder for a lifetime.
#marriage #catholic #christian
I'm going to respectfully bow out at this point. We've shifted topics too much to cover any point of contention in sufficient detail to be worthwhile. I hope we can get into some of those specific points in more depth again in the future.
Thanks for taking the time to discuss!
That's an interesting theory, but, I think, an oversimplification. Far from refraining itself merely to questions of origins and the mechanisms of nature such as scientific tools might help us answer; Christian dogma teaches us about the nature of man, the nature of God, how man ought to relate to God and nature, how God relates to us, how we ought to live, and so on.
Far from merely filling in gaps in knowledge, Christianity presents a comprehensive way of understanding the world and our place in it.
Furthermore, another account of this "best fit" effect you point out is that the Church is always emphasizing this or that aspect of its dogma to teach what the world needs to hear at each point of history. It's not trying out different strategies to stay relevant, but rather giving different emphases to respond to the needs of the human condition.
How would you explain the persistence of Christianity over 2000 years? Obviously back when Jesus walked the earth resource scarcity was a much bigger problem. Christianity survived and thrived amid the ups and downs of the Dark Ages, Medieval Europe, the Renaissance, Enlightenment, and into modernity, and it has taken root in all corners of the world. By your own account, it wouldn't have arisen to address the same concerns as we encounter today, and unlike the religions of Pacific Islanders or the Mayans, it has proven exceptionally universal, and tends to displace local religions over time through evangelization.
You packed a lot into that sentence, can you elaborate a bit?
Or eisigesis, more likely.
Seriously, though, while there is some weird stuff in the Bible worth talking about, it's probably best to start a new thread for that particular strand of exegesis.
Ah-hah, I knew it!
Interesting. I can understand how someone could *not* believe in God, but personally I find various lines of evidence and reasoning to lean in favor of there being a God.
Discounting the idea of God from the outset is what is unreasonable.
I've always wondered if a larger portion of humanity is supposed to devote itself to service, like charitable work, religious orders, and so on, that doesn't involve marriage and children. Say a third of people fell into that camp, then the remaining 2/3rds can all have 3 kids and population would remain steady on average.
Definitely go if you can. I was blessed to visit with friends a few years back, and we had a blast just exploring the city. Also the food slaps.
The Catholic urge to name all your children after the saints in the Roman Canon.
#catholic
nostr:npub1q6ya7kz84rfnw6yjmg5kyttuplwpauv43a9ug3cajztx4g0v48eqhtt3sh nailed it.
Man Budapest has some beautiful architecture.
It's interesting that these models all assume people will, on average, have less than two children—i.e., less than replacement rate—if the population is to peak then decline.
What does that do to mental and societal health? You'll probably see more people with no children whatsoever.
What building is this?
I don't think we actually answered this question, except perhaps by actually doing the thing and talking to people about their experiences with faith and prayer. Perhaps that is enough.


