Avatar
Ben Ewing
72039a17ad045c0e2ffa0b2fdd9c08467f8190e04f4f4672ffb516a61a815f86

Nobody wants to talk to me. Well I guess some things worked and some didn't🤷‍♂️

Wanting to have sex with one gender or another is not a source of achievement, or therefore of pride

I can't find my dressing gown

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Because a lot of it is visual and measurable, and occurred within the past decade, Egypt is currently providing a useful case study in the perils of central planning.

The country over the past ten years (when current leadership took over) took on $120 billion in external debt, and also used a lot of local deficit spending, with the reasonable goal of building lots of new infrastructure, alleviating congestion with new cities, and boosting international tourism to what are some of the best beaches in the world.

But details and order matter. And an entity with a monopoly on violence has less incentive to get the details and path dependence correct, and has fewer error correction methods built in than private developers do.

So the government built a big network of roads and bridges, which helped somewhat, although many of the roads are badly designed and always delayed. They built an entire new capital city for the government and military HQ, along with business and residential districts, which nine years in is still mostly vacant. They are developing the north coast city of El Alamein, but unlike well-designed private developments (eg in El Gouna on the Red Sea), the government was heavily involved for El Alamein, did massive overbuilding with incongruent designs that will take decades to fill (by which time the buildings will be deteriorating).

Now they have chronic power outages due to insufficient power generation. They are building their first nuclear facility, but it only began in 2022 and won’t be finished until 2026 or later (probably later). Maybe they should have started that facility earlier, before their now-empty city…

The average Egyptian pays for a lot of this through currency debasement. They look around and say “yes there are new bridges and entire new cities, but it takes me more hours of work to afford a car than it did ten years ago and there are three-hour power outages each day…” Basically they get taxed in opaque ways via debasement, and don’t benefit from most of the development that they are paying for.

And while those developments might make sense if successful, the order of development, the details of development, and so forth have clearly been suboptimal.

Anyway, good morning.

It's like they had a patient on the operating table and they were like, 'hey, we're going to limit you to 500 calories per day, but we'll implant an extra heart, a couple of extra ears and we'll inject steroids into your right leg.'

Anyway, good evening.

I didn't say it couldn't be done. I just said I forsee a few challenges, to say the least. If it works out for Pubkey then good on them. I still think there's a certain hypocrisy in using the fiat system as part of your bitcoin-themed business though

So accept legal tender in a burger joint themed on a non- legal tender? Wouldn't that be kind of self-defeating?

Trying to compete with the most successful and ubiquitous restaraunt in human history but not accepting legal tender. What could possibly go wrong.

How about de facto relationships laws and #metoo movements?

These make long term or short term relationships much more risky for men. As a result, men stop pursuing women in a romantic sense, therefore their body downregulates t production and upregulates things they do instead (estrogen, to relate to

women platonically, since that is the only low risk way left to relate to women).

So it's cognition which changes behavioural patterns which the body responds to, not the other way around.

This is a fascinating concept and I think it has huge implications. The problem though, seems to be women's inability to find attractive low t men, resulting in falling birthrates and male loneliness. Eg, women who want 'a high t man' despite that not being in the best interests of the man. She doesn't think about what is good for the man though, she goes with her desire (as, arguably, she should).

And not sure I agree with the claim that ability of men to adapt to a sedentary lifestyle results in their automatic success. Yes, they may not lust after woman in the same way, but they are still likely to feel a profound loneliness and ennui wothout a romantic partner, and their low t might result in their inability to mitigate this through even casual encounters.

So we're left with a majority of men who are quite well adapted to survive in such a society in some sense, but quite unable to find a partner. The question then becomes why they would continue to contribute to such a society. And I think the answer is that they will stop paying tax, in the hope that the state collapses, anarchy ensues, and we go back to traditional gender roles where a single man again fulfils the multiple roles that technology, the state and high t men provide to them separately at the moment.

And personally I think he has a vague idea that it must be good, if only that he knows the democrats don't like it

That's okay. Most things politicians do are a play for votes over things they don't understand. Maybe that's a good thing- maybe by not understanding it and thinking he can control it, he underestimates its ability, if adopted widely, to curtail state overreach