I suspect it has more to do with negative ions than CO2 itself, which is generally protective

Thank you for the shoutout amigo 🫂 Been super busy but I need to give zapthreads some love

Yeah, I hacked this in a few hours. Numbers are the PageRank score for that npub in the whole graph, so yes they are not relative at the moment. That's what I meant when I mentioned weights coming soon.

Thanks Evan! Yes it is: https://github.com/zapstore/wot-dvm

🕸️ Deployed a tiny WoT API that calculates which of my follows follow another npub, sorted by PageRank (database has ~1M connections, only follows for now)

🔜 Weighted PageRank with lists (mute & others)

Try it out: curl https://zap.store/wot?from=npub1&to=npub2

https://video.nostr.build/0e2f17611894f30237c4ddde83be0782196d6268be77880c907c77ac8bcbfa5f.mp4

The relay is operational! It's one of the backend pieces for zap.store, which is not ready yet

My ~150 loc basic relay + read-only #blossom server for zap.store now live

Every accepted 1063 event (APK only for now) will trigger storing the linked file:

https://video.nostr.build/a4ed659865066200cbed0092c132a9e6adb9bf8a2f9ff6b751cb1aacb15f2e12.mp4

Code at https://github.com/zapstore/relay

TripAdvisor cares about your privacy

Music to my ears

with NIP-94 and #blossom you can

This is the way

nostr:note1mhssxkvfwcuexjm6cx8zjc5sqj42xy20qtxwzngzzgzelwg2ckzqqwm5er

These concepts are orthogonal. You trust people, and then you know what they're good at (or bad at). Adding up the two makes you trust someone for something.

Question was if you're comfortably sharing this kind of information

I'm processing your idea. It might work

So, maybe after all lists of `p`s + DVMs solve all of our #WoT problems

So if you have a list called "app developers" and you want to find more developers in your network you'd use a DVM/LLM to find for example my "mobile application devs" which are understood to be roughly the same thing?

So you are suggesting that the fact of adding an npub to a specific list is a way of signalling some trust than just a plain follow?

nostr:npub1u5njm6g5h5cpw4wy8xugu62e5s7f6fnysv0sj0z3a8rengt2zqhsxrldq3 have you encountered pushback regarding privacy?

WoT typically involves computing some trust level within a context. I think we need specific trust attestations and use DVMs (and manual observations, why not) on what to trust someone on

Remember that likes, zaps, etc can all be faked

🤩

nostr:note1e8gu5zea45j4nqcyc5frt3gphqydetsefh4zdd7gc2p5qqkzg7mqarfntn

Follows are public and commonplace, trust attestations so far are not.

Would you be comfortable publicly sharing who you trust (for something in particular, or in general)?

#asknostr