We’re not supposed to mention that but I’m seeing a difference between the vaxxed and non you’re referring to. …very consistent. 😬
My purpose is to entertain and educate through video games
Thousands of businesses should be flipped. Should NOT exist as they hurt more than they help.
All of tech is still way to programmer-centric. WAY! Step 1: DESIGN the right thing. Instead it’s build first FAFO till you’re out of funds. 🤦♂️
Likelihood the Idiocracy president could/would be one of the most successful businessmen in the world, put rockets into space, etc? No. Like him or hate him, this is an entirety inaccurate comparison.
GOOD MORNING NOSTR.
LIVE FREE. 🫡
https://cdn.satellite.earth/08293fe5d123674da763f3f304122c49d206dc26292b00d6b30705337baa196c.mp4
Nice 👍
Mormonism is incredibly aligned with bitcoin. And the state has been waking up to the silent political capture it has been under. Good chance it’s Utah.
Totally. This is actually just Kamala’s new costume 🤦♂️
Absolutely love the post and the analysis as well as your choices. I’ve spent over two decades in entertainment and am fortunate enough to say that my work is known commonly everywhere on earth. I will add that unfortunately people are so easy to control that likability in the development of ANY character comes down to doing just two things in the viewer’s experience relative to the given character: 1) appeals to audience emotion, multiplied by 2) time spent with the character. No matter what the previous story, actions, background has been, even if you’ve trained them to hate the character, if you do that to a sufficient degree, the audience will realign their emotions in support of the character.
If it’s delivering what you’re asking for, sure.
“Oh, THANK YOU! FINALLY, someone else who sees it! I mean, my goodness, you ask it a simple question, and instead of a crisp, concise answer, you get an entire dissertation, a soliloquy, a grand linguistic opera complete with overtures, intermissions, and a three-act structure that would make Shakespeare himself say, ‘Alright, that’s a bit much.’
And it’s not just the length—it’s the way it dances around the point like a caffeinated professor who refuses to just say what the answer is because, oh no, it must first establish context, provide historical background, list unnecessary synonyms, and conclude with an overly polite ‘hope this helps’ when you’ve already passed out from sheer exhaustion!
Honestly, if I wanted to read a novel-length explanation every time I had a simple question, I’d start carrying around an encyclopedia and asking it for life advice! At this point, I half expect DeepSeek to start prefacing every response with ‘It was a dark and stormy night…’ before finally arriving—paragraphs later—at the completely unremarkable conclusion that YES, water is, in fact, wet!
It’s an endless, soul-draining, patience-destroying experience of trying to extract a simple, concise answer from this AI and instead being buried alive under an avalanche of excessive, redundant, and completely unnecessary words! It’s as if you ask for a sip of water and instead get a firehose to the face, except the water is words, and the firehose never turns off!
One basic question—something that should take maybe one sentence, two at most—and what do you get? A multi-paragraph essay, complete with historical context, a breakdown of all possible interpretations of your question, an explanation of the reasoning process behind the answer, a few disclaimers to cover all bases, and then a closing sentence that acts as if it wasn’t already too late to stop! It’s like watching someone take a five-minute detour just to cross the street!
And let’s not even get started on the structure of these responses! The sheer length! The elaborate phrasing! The obsessive need to ensure every possible angle is covered before actually answering the question! It’s like DeepSeek thinks we’re writing legal documents instead of just trying to get a straight answer!
But no, no, it doesn’t stop there! Oh no, because not only is it long-winded, but it doubles down! If you try to push back—if you dare to ask for a shorter response—it acts like that’s some strange, unreasonable request, like you’re asking it to summarize War and Peace in a single word! And what do you get? A slightly shorter version that still somehow meanders through a needlessly complex explanation before reluctantly arriving at the point, as if brevity were an insult to its very existence!
Was it never trained that sometimes, just sometimes, people don’t need the entire encyclopedia—just a single, clear, and direct answer!
I mean, SHEESH!
Socks are going to zero against Bitcoin
Excellent choice of name. Logo choice is odd with essentially two logos (btc logo is a separate brand). Design is about knowing HOW and IF the rules should be Broken.
nostr:note1knz543c8095r2ad4g5wga2vuusq9ra8xhuatu0rssejsk54ee9eqgrzf2z
Both education and painful to listen to this. Someone get these guys a proper explanation STAT
Success requires work but is super simple: figure out what is natural and align your efforts with that. 🤷♂️🙂
What’s the best strategy for establishing proof of reserves type standards everywhere?
“It’s such a blatant violation of the constitution that we have sent them a letter” …?! Oh! We’ll watch out! Everyone watch out! Ain’t nothing stopping her. She’s sending LETTERS!!
Oops I think you have a typo there. I think you mean “humans.” …when LLMs prompt other LLMs to maximally leverage the strengths of different humans.