Avatar
⚡️🌱🌙
7560e065bdfe91872a336b4b15dacd2445257f429364c10efc38e6e7d8ffc1ff
Former Youngest Person in the World!! stuartellison.com fantactico.com knostr.io zairk.com 🪴

Ezaptly, it’s also the best anti-spam and signal/noise system, known to man.

Zapping notes isn’t meant to buy you anything.

Replying to Avatar jb55

👀

On Tuesday, Will accidentally started a tech war between two trillion dollar corporations.

You’re allowed to have the zap button in the bio, just not on notes.

But all this publicity does not hurt nostr / Damus.

Not sure, but a mini profile that pops up but keeps my spot in the feed would be good.

Maybe the pop up profile is greyed out with one random button made orange purely for design and aesthetic reasons?

If I put in my bio…

All my content here is 🚨 FREEE OF CHARGE 🚨 you have my full explicit permission to use it, totally unrestricted for free, however you like, no payment required or necessary, now or ever.

… Can I have a zap button?

Today I learnt that every nostr note is actually a sales contract with Apple…

… according to the world’s largest tech company themselves.

🤣

Doesn’t that interpretation opens them up to bigger loophole liabilities than the Pepsico Harrier Jet!

Replying to Avatar signal_and_rage

What if Apple sold me the zaps, could I then use them in the app? 🤔

3.1 Payments

3.1.1 In-App Purchase:

If you want to unlock features or functionality within your app, (by way of example: subscriptions, in-game currencies, game levels, access to premium content, or unlocking a full version), you must use in-app purchase. Apps may not use their own mechanisms to unlock content or functionality, such as license keys, augmented reality markers, QR codes, cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency wallets, etc. Apps and their metadata may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase, except as set forth in 3.1.3(a).

Apps may use in-app purchase currencies to enable customers to “tip” the developer or digital content providers in the app.

Any credits or in-game currencies purchased via in-app purchase may not expire, and you should make sure you have a restore mechanism for any restorable in-app purchases.

Apps may enable gifting of items that are eligible for in-app purchase to others. Such gifts may only be refunded to the original purchaser and may not be exchanged.

Apps distributed via the Mac App Store may host plug-ins or extensions that are enabled with mechanisms other than the App Store.

Apps offering “loot boxes” or other mechanisms that provide randomized virtual items for purchase must disclose the odds of receiving each type of item to customers prior to purchase.

Digital gift cards, certificates, vouchers, and coupons which can be redeemed for digital goods or services can only be sold in your app using in-app purchase. Physical gift cards that are sold within an app and then mailed to customers may use payment methods other than in-app purchase.

Non-subscription apps may offer a free time-based trial period before presenting a full unlock option by setting up a Non-Consumable IAP item at Price Tier 0 that follows the naming convention: “XX-day Trial.” Prior to the start of the trial, your app must clearly identify its duration, the content or services that will no longer be accessible when the trial ends, and any downstream charges the user would need to pay for full functionality. Learn more about managing content access and the duration of the trial period using Receipts and Device Check.

Apps may use in-app purchase to sell and sell services related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs), such as minting, listing, and transferring. Apps may allow users to view their own NFTs, provided that NFT ownership does not unlock features or functionality within the app. Apps may allow users to browse NFT collections owned by others, provided that the apps may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase.

But Damus has no paywalls.

There is nothing to unlock, nothing is restricted, all content here is free.

What do Apple think people are buying with zaps?

Zaps are NOT an exchange, you receive nothing in echo for a zap, no digital thing, no special rights or permissions, so zaps are not a purchase.

Zaps are a tip, a gift, a donation.

Exactly, nothing is paywalled so I’m not sure how zaps are connected to receiving any content?

All content is available to everyone all the time, irrespective of any zaps.

Please talk it through with them Will.

They seem to specify where tips are connected to receiving digital content.

But I don’t really follow that, because you already received the content and all the content here is open source!

There are no paywalls anywhere in Damus.

So the zap and the receiving of content not really connected?

I don’t think Apple see Damus as missed revenue.

But yes, tipping a profile v’s tipping a note seems like the only distinction. Subtle, and also rather obtuse.

I guess “user notes = content” is the case they are making.

It gets more complicated, when things go full X-platform as nostr allows.

I still think there will be implementations of zaps to be found, that work for everyone. eg I get billed by some in-app store for the Apple Tax.

🤔

Strong precedent. nostr:note1ydzxqj0m4tv4fvcgjcnqt972y942ftukm3a20r0q9mmdwxtw5yuqukx6zl

Yeah, I would crudely estimate that the addressable markets are as follows…

iOS…….1,300 million

PWA……….80 million

Jailbreak…..8 million

Other views welcome.

I keep saying the same thing, ecosystems need ramps!

Damus on iOS is an amazing beachhead for nostr. I like using Damus. Damus is the biggest property on the protocol.

I like PWA’s because they’re more OS agnostic, they’re just clunky to access from iOS. But iOS supports service workers now.

There’s a contribution slider in the settings to match zaps with app development contributions, so it’s 100% up to the user.

iOS is a ramp to 1.3 billion people.

Shouldn’t sniff at that.

nostr should have a substantial presence on iOS app store with many implementations of the protocol.

It’s up to Damus how they spend their development time. But I hope they keep a presence on iOS rather than get rugged by Apple.

Progressive Web Apps allow more developer freedom than native iOS apps, but compromise on some of the functionality of a native app.

It’s a difficult choice and not fun being blindsided so abruptly.

But Damus isn’t nostr.

Damus is just one nostr app… on iOS.

nostr apps should be available on iOS, there’s a lot of value in that, but they will have to be built on iOS terms and conditions.

Will has to choose his future development strategy between zaps and iOS. But either way he can still have a zap free iOS implementation 15 days from now.

Damus has had a fork imposed on it, it might split and continue both paths.