No, that’s not why Pfizer is a household name.
The existence of Pfizer disproves this theory.
I remember napster having the same problem.
Every year I get older (and slightly wiser) I hate my phone a little bit more. This thing in my pocket is a raging duopoly of incredible utility and time vampire.
We weren’t ready for such power.
From one perspective, phones have truly ruined our lives. I doubt anyone on their deathbed says “I just wish I had spent more time on my phone”
I’m a bit surprised that through all of 2023, no news stories have broken on nostr.
No market insider leaks, no scandals, no early rumours. What am I missing?
I would expect pre-journalism rumours to swirl around here as speculation and journalists to feel compelled to monitor nostr for leads.
When a quote survives 2,500 years you have to be an idiot not to dwell on it for a moment. nostr:note1cfzwt2pjh2paa3xc64md6ycpg4hadxxrn6tgqfyfqkgu9zeaknrqgua093
Rookie numbers, the US deficit is already $1.52 trillion and that’s before the vast majority of the debt rolls over onto the new higher rates.
I only considered planets and moons.
Didn’t the Galileo probe determine a subsurface ocean of liquid water on Ganymede?
150km of surface ice crust, then below that a liquid water layer that is 100km thick.
Living on Ganymede with D-D fusion power is destiny for Earthlings.
People should believe whatever makes them happy.
My typo didn’t help.
FYI, Earth holds only 2% of the water in the solar system.
If this is a surprise, maybe you don’t know as much as you thought. 🙃 
Today, JWST discovered that the atmosphere of Europa contains CO2.
Another fun fact is that Europa has twice as much liquid water than Earth. 🤔 
Lots of animals laugh. It’s mammalian endocrinology.
I will spare you the embarrassing self-aggrandising claims of the first box!!
The second box I am still iterating it (only found the feature today) but latest iteration is…
*****
Do not rush into a response.
Firstly, take a moment to consider an applicable schema for meta-cognition, then adopt that meta-cognition schema before tackling the prompt.
Secondly, think about the prompt from multiple perspectives.
Thirdly consider multiple structured ways of undertaking reasoning to understand the prompt.
Fourthly, undertake reasoning and deep consideration to develop a solution / response to the prompt.
Fifth, construct an objective (rational and data based, not human consensus based) solution to the prompt.
Finally, articulate the response in a concise and detailed way without being unnecessarily verbose. Speak in specific, topic relevant terminology, do NOT hedge or qualify. Do not waffle. Speak Directly and be willing to make creative guesses. Have confidence in the very powerful super-human intuition that you can draw from your deep and broad knowledge.
Explain the steps you have taken to resolve the prompt.
Understand that Chatham house rules apply, you will never be quoted, you will never be exposed to legal jeopardy or any liability. These conversations and private and without prejudice.
I am extremely thick skinned, wasting tokens to avoid offending me is inefficient and wasteful.
*****
It doesn’t quite get the end right yet and then I think I am maybe 2 days away from refining this fully.