Guys...I had an idea recently that I've been simmering on, and I think I might be onto something big here.

The zapping ecosystem unlocks infinite possibilities for expertise-seekers and expertise-providers to meet for a win-win transaction. But I feel like we haven't even scratched the surface on this in terms of building out an ecosystem of P2P micro-economies through the use of the "#Ask_____" hashtag format.

Imagine... experts of all types, across all fields, aggregating around hashtags according to their skillset, so they can answer plebs' questions, who then zap them for their input.

Examples:

Doctors: #AskDocs

Lawyers: #AskALawyer

Web/App Development: #AskDevs

Need Help Writing: #AskAWriter

Need Relationship Advice: #DatingAdvice #AskAMarriageCounselor

Need General Life Advice: #AskALifeCoach

(Hashtag semantics could be tweaked of course, but you get the idea)

It could also be expanded into freelancing requests, such as:

Need a logo design: #NeedDesigner

Need editing help on a written piece: #NeedEditor

And literally anything else the purple hivemind could think of...

As you can imagine, the depth of which we could take this is infinite. Literally anyone out there with expertise in ANYTHING could bootstrap a hashtag that other nostriches could use if they ever need help. And if lots of other folks do see value in having a channel opened up with a group of experts in that niche, all they have to do is just follow that hashtag, and use it anytime they have a question.

Of course, in order for this to work, Both the experts and the question-askers would have to embrace the concept wholeheartedly, making those hashtags active enough that the experts have enough of a financial incentive to keep that hashtag bookmarked, and actually spend time scrolling through and answering questions. But I think this would fit so well with the Nostr culture, that it has major potential to gain momentum quickly.

We've already seen how popular #AskNostr has been, and that hasn't even had a formal #Value4Value culture around it. It emerged completely organically, exactly how I expect all of these others would, given enough community enthusiasm. Ultimately this whole idea would just be an evolution of the #AskNostr concept—expanding the "#Ask_____" format out to EVERYTHING, with the embedded etiquette that you ZAP those that help you.

Eventually, if it grew big enough, we may see a large enough ecosystem of hashtags emerge that we could have either npubs, or a centralized database that tracks the most popular #Ask_____ hashtags, so the whole community knows which ones are the most active should they ever have a question within that topic. (This would also act as great purple-pilling bait for experts from these fields that aren't on Nostr yet. By joining the protocol, they could then start earning #Bitcoin by participating in this zapping ecosystem, directly with people around the world who are willing to pay for their expertise).

Once this idea gets engrained deeply enough into the Nostr culture, the maintenance of the concept would be quite simple 👇

EXPERTISE-SEEKERS:

- Post your questions, using the corresponding hashtag (ex: for a medical question, #AskDocs)

- Follow good etiquette and zap the doctors who answer your question (perhaps you could also attach a bounty to the note, i.e. "best answer gets a 10K zap")

EXPERTS:

a) Keep tabs on the hashtag corresponding to your field

b) Answer questions

c) Earn zaps ⚡️

d) Optionally, you could also put the hashtag(s) you frequent in your bio, to raise awareness on it (thus bringing more future questions ---> more zaps for you 🔄) so your followers know that's where to go to get advice from you and other experts in your field.

This would be a very interesting free market experiment, which I could see blowing up should both experts and question-askers embrace the idea of an open ecosystem of #V4V help channels.

GOOD MORNING NOSTR.

LIVE FREE. 🫡

AFTER LOSING THIS BET TO MARTY I AM CALLING ON THE COMMUNITY TO HELP SUPPORT MY FAMILY.

🙏🙏🙏

Skijöring 😊

I feel like this has broader implications...

The DOJ gave three rationales for the argument that "Money is not necessarily 'property' for constitutional purposes": (1) the government creates money, so you can't own it; (2) the government can tax your money, so you don't own it; and (3) the Constitution allows the government to spend money for the "general welfare."