Avatar
onthephone
76076b9e2eca3c4f25435780f57b1d5649c7d08b784c20f96c384fa0fec5456f
URL is Monero address ltcmweb1qqt8h4d3h5kvya07k59qe3qc0xgt4q7k88yx6qz68ty5mwzewya3dyqmxs92ur2rq9ugaws5s6ce590jpdf535aktd9x0d2fvk8t9u84jtyw8294p bitcoincash:qzs4rz8d22lzp63hk2fpa8y4wpptkex0z5vz9tt4n0
Replying to Avatar pcre

Gold and Silver Coins in the Middle Ages: A Comparison with Bitcoin and Monero

Precious metals like gold and silver have always been valuable due to their rarity and durability. They are well-suited as a medium of exchange and store of value. However, verifying their authenticity is not always easy. Gold can be adulterated with cheaper metals, resulting in a lower amount of genuine gold. In contrast, Bitcoin is protected from such manipulation through its decentralized system and the motto "don't trust, verify".

To combat the problem of metal manipulation in the Middle Ages, coins were minted with guarantees of authenticity under threat of severe punishment. Melting down coins was also prohibited to protect the purity of the metals. Through these measures, people could trust in the purity of the metals, but it required a ruler to enforce these rules.

Gold coins typically had a consistent gold content, but this could be altered by minters or rulers themselves. With a "coin reform" or "coin exchange", the minting process was changed or the metal content adjusted. Often, one-tenth of the wealth was withheld when exchanging old coins for new ones - ten old coins were exchanged for nine new ones. This was a tax on people's wealth and was not very popular.

In comparison, Bitcoin cannot prevent such taxation. One could divide Bitcoin into legitimate and illegitimate categories, similar to how certain gold coins were accepted on markets in the Middle Ages. A "Bitcoin exchange" could be implemented where only verified Bitcoins are considered valid after withholding one-tenth of the wealth.

Monero, on the other hand, prevents such practices through its fungibility.

In walks the Bitcoin ETF.

Hear about bitcoin.

Research & buy bitcoin.

(Not your keys, not your coins)

Wonder what happens as the limited supply inches toward zero.

(All bitcoin ends up in hands of powerful)

Experience high onchain fees.

Try LN. Too much effort for self-custody.

Realize bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative rug pulled the OG p2p digital cash narrative and is designed to mirror the existing banking system.

(So much for cypherpunk)

Find several other trusted cryptos that each have their own unique features, but all share fast, secure & inexpensive transactions with built in fungibility, and some mainstream support.

Think, if Bitcoin doesn't have a CEO who is managing all of the forks and development?

Is running a node really a 'vote' (as they say) for decentralization, if all node runners regularly upgrade their nodes?

Oops. Ordinals! Devs, "Did I do that?"

You are only number go up. It's a shame, because each change made to Bitcoin reduces the only leg it has to stand on, namely "the original".

If I ever need toothpicks I know where to look! I love those long, skinny legs!

Harder & harder to be free. Even crypto transactions are beginning to ask for KYC, or at least asking to use KYC wallets like Coinbase, Crypto(dot)com, etc. SMH. People just smile and say OK.

https://odysee.com/@NaomiBrockwell:4/car-privacy-part-3:1