Avatar
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ whoever loves Digit
7776c32d4b1d1e8bf2a96babeb43ad9ade157bd363d89b87fb63e6f145558888
Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe. To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.

Holup

Chat bots are useful info finders, they get shit wrong all the time so you have to double check but they can answer a lot of questions I never find humans answering

They're also useful to practice debating with

Specific example of both - I used to insist that "mental health" should mean "cognitive health" and not include "emotional health" but I used slightly different wording. A chat bot explained it to me in this wording during an argument, which makes it sound very silly, so I learned not to say that silly shit and instead make clearer statements on the difference between cognitive and emotional health.

Also, great minds think alike, half my ideas get used by people who thought of the same thing without even seeing mine.

The best part is, I probably don't need to do any coding or waiting. I'm so good at design and there's such strong demand for improvement in the world, there's a chance someone else taking my idea will be faster than me.

Strange how you type a lot but can't read. What I said was that I will get it done, not that I won't. And I implied I can write software or pay to get it written, not that I can't. And I definitely didn't ask about USD 🫡🀣

Fuck it, I'm reposting a mostr.pub user on purpose this time πŸ€™

nostr:note1e9jq3pr6z83nt7hmzj0r4dy62fjd76gygkzler0vlkk6wpcn8peqqsldha

I accidentally reposted something from a mostr.pub user -_-

I don't see a point to the mutual-following-based web of trust except maybe sheer simplicity. A better web of trust wouldn't purely focus on who trusts who.

It would factor in how much you trust people and what topics you trust them on by letting you shift the priority list of what npubs you trust.

It would also factor in which content people do and don't trust from each other in general by using content-based judgments instead of only npub-based judgments at the furthest degree of separation. In other words, putting an npub at your highest priority slot would not filter out what npubs they disapprove of and show stuff from what npubs they approve of. It would show you what content they approve of and filter out what content they disapprove of.

The "approving and disapproving" has different meaning depending on context, since there are different uses for web of trust. In the context of feed curation, posts they approve of could mean posts from anyone they follow and posts they don't approve of could mean posts they've reported. That's kinda like the existing thing with mutual follows. But in the context of a reddit clone, the web of trust could be like a weighted karma score based on upvotes and down votes. In the context of a wiki, upvotes and downvotes would make sense as accuracy judgements there too.

I am here to say it. Those who pay are dumber than pirates. I'm willing to bet this is backed up by any measurement of intelligence we can reasonably agree on

Is the new cat food farfalle? Cats cannot live on farfalle.

Look at home made cat food recipes online, part of the price of store bought cat food is to give it shelf life and you can pay less to provide better quality. Cat food supply chain becoming unreliable so it's essential for people whose cats don't feel comfortable with certain kibble

As long as you kids are both enjoying the nostr πŸ™

#bloomscrolling

nostr:note1k6x24mcufxea6afs452hjxd7g6syzre2qk3a875us04z87akkgqq8v02aj