I don't like the free/premium account model because it's designed to generate profit instead of providing resources at cost. I won't support it financially even though I appreciate the free service it provides
Did nostr:npub1nxy4qpqnld6kmpphjykvx2lqwvxmuxluddwjamm4nc29ds3elyzsm5avr7 really just reduce the maximum video upload size to 7 MB on free accounts?
Idk but that's about the same as the attachment limit size you can send in discord chats, kinda reasonable these days
Let's not forget Van Gogh's masterpiece 'The Sunflowers,' when some mischievous teenagers threw soup on it under the pretext of climate preservation.
#artstr #nostr
https://video.nostr.build/e76719328be7af5a57bfc37e99986e077d8a89ae3eaa92d9dd5b9ab47ed0bb19.mp4
To be fair there was glass covering it I think
π«₯
If I remember right (from a while ago before previous npubs of mine), I may have actually found out about nostr from Wikipedia. I had been waiting for someone out there to try making something with decentralized keypair-based logins (Ethereum wallet "web3" ecosystem existed for years and sucked)
I didn't even know I would find a wiki to be part of from ground zero here, such a tragedy for Jimmy Wales accidentally helping me get here π€π»
Thanks for making it so simple.
All I knew was people use git to disseminate code and Microsoft felt the need to buy GitHub without immediately ruining it... I hate Microsoft so I found that very sus, figured they just want to control the code collaboration process, and figured the smart people would work on decentralizing it
I actually found out about ngit the same day I was making the wiki entry for "GotHub" because laeserin made an entry for ngit at almost the same time, otherwise my gothub entry would have just said "someday a decentralized git should be developed" or something. Events like that are why I believe there must be some kind of god
This list and then the other one saying you've never developed an OS are sus when put together
I think you're secretly developing linuxstr π€
PLEASEπ°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°π°
https://image.nostr.build/b2f4b6e18a733eb64c7cfb7f359b66d0ee73fce9b09335bef5f24d8e9198e0ab.webp
*pushes the print money button faster and offers you more money*
Now do you care?
*again*
How about now?
*again*
This is high praise, saying it will skip feature parity and jump straight from "catching up" to "way ahead" in one major update
Might repost this every month from now on and listen to power by Kanye West even though I'm not even a coder and barely know what git is
Something about the way that was framed made me think "this guy is doing denialism about a system that doesn't let everyone have a stable IP address." You use a lot of hyperbole and I wasn't seeing that your actual idea is kinda close enough since you could help all kinds of technologies decentralize and spread explosively.
I'm not sure why I was clinging so hard to my commie views in that argument though - I've long believed in solving this issue with a form of capitalism anyway, those types of crypto that natively support smart contracts for file storage and stuff. This would also massively help drug addicts keep phones & encourage charities to help them get free phones because it would be easier to make money on having a phone instead of pawning it
Nah, it was servers. I was saying I couldn't think of a non-violent or even feasible way to have "sovereign" servers. But now I'm thinking it's all relative and you lowering the barrier to entry does help individuals gain some sovereign authority in the server universe
I'm usually pretty good at memorizing every nevent id I publish just in case but that one is slipping the mind I must admit
It was the one where I kept going "I double dog dare you to kill the president or ur server isn't sovereign"
Lmao, tempted to make this the whole wiki entry for https://wikifreedia.xyz/the-american-uniparty