Avatar
Cyber Seagull
77953b3a63bcf1c748dbdeef109bd56de48c30edcd27d2092440c3adca31c975
Tiramisu. God. Bitcoin. Drivechain. In that order.

Will miners vote on things that drive users and their fees away ?

Votes on bip 300 withdraws are not votes on if it goes through. Its a confirmation that it took place.

People still split their penises to appease the kangaroo gods.

Stupid wars happen all the time.

If one happens you can be sure its funded by Liquid and competing projects who stand to lose. It will even be fought by projects who have nothing to lose but think they do because some mid twitter influencer picked a side. LN would be able to offer a better network on a side chain, such as lightning.

Checkout drivechain.xyz

I worked too hard on that meme.

Miner activated soft fork was such an ace card. Paul must have been sitting on that little Yugioh monster card for ages.

It was the nuclear option.

When the arguments against Bip-300 became so obviously empty, vicious and biased by devs of competing projects whom non-technical Bitcoiners trust, he pushed the big red button.

Don't trust, Verify. IS bitcoin.

"...miners can activate bip 300 and sovereign nodes remain sovereign. Nothing changes for them..."

#drivechain #sidechain #Bip300

End user responsibility. If i make wooden spoons and you use them to clog up your nose, am i responsible as a spoon exporter ?

No.

But for some reason my rich neighbor will ban wooden spoons because of your behavior.

Whichbis obvious if you visit any of these places.

The "first world" has the most restrictive and authoritarian plastic policies but also the best waste management. I can't get a plastic bag from a store to use twice as a garbage bag because some guatemalan throws their coke bottlen in the river.

There are several ways. On the Sidechain side of things, scripting can assign a token or set amount of tokens that the project and users agree is part of the design, to whoever signed the peg-in. This creates a sidechainnside user and account with forward rights to those tokens.

If some specific set of sidechain scripting favored miners, and thus made users vulnerable, everyone would know and reject the project OR accept it as part of some larger benefit. Let the market decide. Our main contention is that the market and market competition is a greater innovative force than the vitcoin devs and priesthood that have directed it up to now. It's essentially an argument between a communist or capitalist bitcoin future. Are things like RGB, Lightning, ect, market driven innovation or dev (politburo) driven.

The point is, as a user of bitcoin, none of this affects your normal use. You benefit from a means to adopt any potential challenger to bitcoin technology that might arise in the unknowable future, voluntarily. You benefit from a more secure network, through a more decentralized and incentivised miner environment. But if you want to just keep using bitcoin the way you have and never risk it in a sidechain you can.

But i think what interests you is the scaling ability, while maintaining the security and sovereignty features of main bitcoin.

More clients and wallets 🙄 look at this shit, devs keep building that no one is asking for.

Projects that will be forgotten in 3 years.

How convenient he ignores the petro dollar and saudi arabia accepting yuan/rub.

The entire logic of reserve currency is based on the petro dollar.