I welcome all adequate filters and limits that remove spam as much as possible for Bitcoin to continue be robust MONETARY network.
rounding error ... no one cares about rounding error
We speak about the following scenario.
So for you JPEGs (of butts and dicks) on the Bitcoin MONETARY network are not spam. You would allow, like any shitoiner, even audio, video and whatever people want. Maybe make the blocks bigger to put MP3s. Its the people data which is not spam for you.
For me and my Knots node, this is spam.
Running Bitcoin Knots.
Happy birthday Hal.
You stay Bitcoin Legend forever and we miss you.
nostr:nevent1qqszlwd3d5g6h3sje5w40wn8c6c3dhjaqflp0q55vaasau63kxqhayc6tkmge
Spam is not concensous.
Spam is not going to be confirmed. It will be filtered out.
Sorry, I decide on my Bitcoin Knots full node what is spam. And Bitcoin Knots filters it for me.
You fail to understand what is spam.
spam is valuable only for spammers
Bitcoin is monetary network for monetary transactions. There are meme and NFT shitcoins for spam.
He likes to be fucked by all central banks. Central gang banks with Warren Buffett🍆
When majority of nodes limit and filter spam, spam will be limited and filtered.
And nodes create the network and enforce the rules.
"So, who secures Bitcoin?!
If securing Bitcoin requires consensus on what Bitcoin is, and Bitcoin is a database of values assigned to keys, and Bitcoin has a protocol for reassignment of keys, then securing Bitcoin can only be done by … your node!
Nodes! Nodes! Nodes!
In the end, YOU secure Bitcoin, but the only time that matters is when you agree with someone else on what Bitcoin is, and the only way that you can express yourself to others is via your node.
You can try to abstract this and say that hodlers of last resort secure it, or that you can express yourself by buying or selling, but the only way you can actually communicate yourself is via enforcement of the protocol.
What about Miners?
Miners are suppliers of blocks, nothing more. Nodes demand consensus-compatible blocks as a vessel for key reassignment. Miners’ ability to influence the protocol is limited to the wiggle room within the protocol’s magic numbers.
For example, they can limit blocksize if they can cooperate and coordinate over shared incentives, and they can exclude transactions in the same way. But when a miner exercises any power that is detrimental to consensus they approach high risks at a quick pace.
This same dynamic applies to re-orgs, 51% attacks, etc. These attacks are not only risks to miners in that there is a cost in sacrificing blocks or failing probabilities, they run the higher-level risk of being entirely ignored and excluded from extra-protocol consensus, the market itself.
Nodes actually define what a “miner” is."
Full text here:
https://medium.com/bitcoinerrorlog/who-secures-bitcoin-95b19bbcda3c
In theory it should be easy as pie - freedom of speech decentralized social network, Bitcoin Zaps system, holding your own access keys
Monetary system > arbitrary data storage system
nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7l3vw43 nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4sppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshscy566r
Good. There is some hope if you disagree with Peter Todd's post.
The other side is the shitcoiner side. Let me guess. You agree with this too?
Not touching that puke.
All good, and yes I agree with you.
We, the people with different opinion are the cult, the trolls, the aggressive ones, the oppressors ... I am sure I have noticed even more "definitions"
I say we simply cherish freedom, peace, sovereignty, property and love and we want Bitcoin to continue be freedom sovereign money it is now.
The globalists corrupted legacy media / propaganda is not hated enough. When will be dealt with Soros?
My observation is that the global powers pressure them to avoid escalation as for now they don't like to start WW3.
Russia supports Iran but also pressure them to deescalate.
USA supports Israel but also pressure them to deescalate.
So both of them do a limited responses to 'wash their faces' and not be considered weak. The rest is mostly an effect.