they wont be able to print money to easily finance wars but they sure as hell can still put a gun to your head for taxes

Slow food ftw. 🫂

It's Sourdough Sunday.

Week 128 with #SaturdaysForSatoshi.

While fiat world is doing fiat things (wars), Bitcoiners around the world are celebrating genesis day, by future proofing their keys.

Security called the cops on me.

They came,

I told them my rights,

they left.

Morale of the story:

Hodl your goddamn keys, know your rights, and use them!

Not if they work for Bitcoin, save in Bitcoin, and spend in Bitcoin...

After what went down with Maduro, surely arresting Fauci shouldn't be that difficult now would it?

I have to admit, debasing time would be pretty neat.. 🧐🤔

That's cool

but I'm curious how much of that is just exchanges consolidating their UTXOs

considering the mempool is basically empty, thinking at some point we're going to have the P2P usage so chain analysis is futile is hopium

Hopium to transact p2p?

Another year and you are still as clueless as ever on how to use bitcoin, mate. Hoping you put some effort this year instead of the constant bashing, rooting for ya

Happy New Year to every Knots runner, every Ocean miner and basically to every non-NPC in Bitcoin preserving the cypherpunk values and freedom mindset! You’re the real ones! 🥂

most federal agents tend to be boring people, and when online they cannot divert from their mission asigned by their boss, which must explain the unhuman levels of refusal of the truth.

this bitcoinisfuture is almost nearly a bot, which means he's an agent who has no real discussions or even thoughts, you can make all the good points, he'll leave and repeat the same slop over the other corner.

*desperately consults chat GPT*

you want this to be applicable to UTXOs but you completely fail to show how UTXOs function like cash bills.

a 100k sat utxo with coinjoin history is NOT "considered entirely equivalent" to a 100k sat straight from a miner.

your peer might not care,

but he CAN *distinguish* between them.

unlike cash bills.

for a value transfer system to be fungible, units must be BOTH 1. equal and 2. indistinguishable.

therefore UTXOs are not fungible like cash bills.

you should read the things you post

"Fungibility refers only to the equivalence and INDISTINGUISHABILITY of each unit of a commodity or other thing with other units of the same thing..."

if you can DISTINGUISH between utxos of the same value,

they are *not fungible by definition.

"The AI said something I want to believe is evidence" LOL

your AI slop specifically says "fungible assets can be exchanged or substituted on a one-to-one basis without any loss of value OR DISTINCTION."

you can distinguish between UTXOs of the same value.

The slop that you're sharing *specifically refutes* the thesis that you want to use it as evidence for.

again, for fungibility to be a property of the asset, units must be equal *and indistinguishable.*

I suggest NOT relying on AI slop without careful consideration.