Bitcoin: 12 words in your head.

Fiat: gun to your head.

Ah ok. Gotcha👍So more taxes and restrictions in order to stop the spread. The more i think about this i get the impression that it is positive if the followers of science do as they are told and stop breathing so therefore they are not emitting CO2 anymore.

In your estimation, how much CO2 do humans contribute compared to total CO2 emitted?

Tell me this is about an ideology to you without telling me.

I have never denied that the climate changes, I have never denied that humans have an impact. I made it very clear where I think The Science™ amounts to political nonsense. But you wouldn't be interested I see since its just "climate change deniers" are people who believe in The Science™ and nothing else exists.

Very thoughtful and scientific of you. I'm sure you are well versed on the topic and have great knowledge.

German government news. Do you fact check the fact checkers? 😂

Seriously? 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

re-read what I said:

I never said CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas or doesn't contribute to warming.

I never said that humans aren't having any effect on the climate.

I said CO2 is not a *pollutant*

I said there are tons of holes in the idea that it's the *dominant* force

and I said that there isn't a *crisis.*

None of what you said (regardless of its degree of exaggeration by an apparatus of politically driven and funded science) follows that the world is about to end or that this is a horrific development for the planet or for humanity. Politics has attached this insane leap of logic *without* any evidence supported almost entirely by the belief that humans are an evil force that should never have any effect on the world and if one does arise at all, its a horrible thing that must be stopped.

I'm arguing against an anti-human ideology that turns simple observations into political catastrophes in an effort to get power.

FYI if your article starts with "fact check" it almost immediately gets put into a bracket of a group of political biased liars with about the worst track record imaginable.

Just for the future I would try to find a source that doesn't sound exactly like the mainstream, corrupt authoritarians that have used that phrase to push disgustingly bullshit propaganda for years.

- This is only a glancing observation for the sake of the strength of your argument in the future among people who don't trust the mainstream.

Agreed. But I do feel obligated to caveat because its not that the word is "triggering," but merely that it is deeply false based on what the establishment attaches to the idea.

It's just that the dominant parts of that narrative they spin are total lies:

• It causes more and terrible storms (no it doesn't)

• It causes more droughts and forest fires (no it doesn't)

• CO2 is a pollutant (no it isn't)

• That it is bad for plant & animal life to have more CO2 or for the planet to get warmer (no it isn't)

• That its bad for human life for the planet to get warmer (no it isn't)

• That the planet wouldn't be getting warmer if we weren't driving around in cars (not remotely true)

• That it will keep getting hotter forever until everything bursts into flames (not only not true based on it's more base premises, but CO2 as a greenhouse gas has a diminishing effect, basically a "bitcoin halving" like warming effect where no matter how much more we add it will simply stop contributing to the GHE at a certain point - even if it is the most important factor for a warming planet, which is not at all proven or even very sensible)

If you take all these simple facts out of the foundation of the narrative, there just isn't that much left. And it distracts from the REAL problems we have in energy & establishes a framing that will make these problems worse, instead of better.

I ramble here only to make a point. That mindset is absolutely critical, and we have to stop submitting to a frame that is clearly wrong & forces us into a model of thinking that will do more damage than good. But generally I actually agree with your note 😆

Of course, the climate crisis is accompanied by hysteria and sometimes bad politics - but the data showing the global surface temperature is clear. The main reason is the sealing of the atmosphere by CO2 (greenhouse effect). Climate change with its man-made part is real.

What do Bitcoiners do there? If the concept of the org is to want deindustrialization over real solutions, we have no place there.

And also we don’t need any orgs.

Decentralization for the win.

I disagree. 99% of the good people have left FFF.

Did myself after giving a presentation on integrated energy systems and how decentralized energy can create clean abundance.

Reaction was overwhelmingly negative. They want authoritarian rule and control over others.

Those who are freedom minded have gone elsewhere.

I really don't agree that climate change is as big as they say and don't agree on the impact they claim humans have

We would be better off cleaning up plastics and planting trees than we are fighting cowfarts. Their whole narrative is shaky af. They use 10% truth and 90% lies to sell you a narrative that is pushed by fear.

One thing you are right about, the last thing we need to do is follow a set of rich folks and bankers and think they suddenly care about the environment.

In the end the shift to clean energy is inevitable for economic reasons already. The rest of the environmental pollution is caused by the corrupt fiat system.

So, eventually as long as we build on Bitcoin, the climate crisis will resolve no matter if the dire predictions are true or not.

The only way we can not survive climate change is by doing what the Davos and FFF people suggest.