hmm, I tried reinstalling, no luck still won't fetch my profile after adding relay.0xchat.com as a circle.

Still didn't fetch, I updated my profile on both jumble and 0xchat main app so it should be on the relay.

Excited to try this. I joined relay.0xchat.com but it didn't fetch my nostr profile. Or is the idea that I make a new profile for this circle and it uses that instead of my existing nostr profile?

我两个手机，但是其中一个无法添加relay

What is the difference between the full version and the lite version? What is the use case?

Are adding a member and changing the Nostr group ID done in the same commit?

Group members rely on the Nostr group ID to pull the group’s messages, right? How can the other members be informed of the new Nostr group ID?

Also, shouldn't it populate my profile?

My feedback:

- lovely onboarding

- not sure how to invite anyone - stuck at add circle no idea where to get that

- expected being able to share an invite link of some sort

Once I get past that I can report on other Ui / UX

—Automatic group ID rotation when members or group info change

What are the rules for rotating the Group ID?

#purplestack is a Flutter stack for nostr:

- purplebase Dart nostr library: local-first based on sqlite and a websocket pool

- models library, for nostr models and relationships

- Riverpod

- Material 3

- Gorouter

- Cached image provider, etc

- A big context file with recipes for different use-cases

That is a good question and the answer is relative, you asked which one is more secure for messaging and you did not mentioned privacy of anonymity features which are tied to the concept of secure but not a must.

You missed probably, in my opinion one of the top 3, which is Session...

All three offer you a great level of security in the areas of privacy and decentralization but out of the box only one anonymize you, which is Session...

nostr:nprofile1qqsvnx99ww0sfall7gpv2jtz4ftc9v6wevgdd7g4hh7awkpfvwlezugppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0jwtjpy is the best choice for most people because its UI is simple enough, no email or phone number required, although ***if you are not using your own Server you are subject to data logging from a third party...***

Session Messenger on the other hand is all onionized, no need for your own server/node/relay, you are cover in all fronts out of the box for voice, messages and videos.

Nostr is excellent, but not out of the box, you need a client with NIP - 17, one that let you choose proper relays (your own preferable) and full privacy using TOR built in. Hands down Amethyst for Android does the job perfectly, but you need to do some configuration yourself,select privacy to full in settings, select proper relays, install your own relay even better and let but not least, sign in with Amber with TOR enabled. So not for grandma and grandpa, errrr, not for most people at all, hence why Primal gets so many users despite failing in privacy and security (is getting better) but easy to use from the get go. nostr:nprofile1qqs84k6jpsav0jmdeqjn2zxlpnsajaw6f8l0m2d4e9t8gjsyn53s4nspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumfv9khxarj9e3k7mgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmnyhat8ky 0xChat is worth mentioning, pure art, I will say a must have for E2EE messaging and calls, but the onion routing requires proxy configuration, from the test I have performed, better Orbot... That may change soon, they may add TOR as Amethyst has, time will say, that could bring more adoption into Nostr but I wish a 0xChat Messenger more like SimpleX, the UI is still hard to understand for Grandma, and if grandma doesn't get it, you are not doing it right... you want adoption, you need simplicity out of the box.

So, if you know what you are doing and the people you want to chat with and connect are into Nostr and understand the tech, go for Amethyst full privacy or 0xChat with Orbot.

If you have non Nostr people you want to keep in touch, perhaps is best to introduced them to Session or SimpleX Chat using your own server

Hope this helps

Why do I have to encrypt and send multiple messages to the push server?

I'm somewhat interested in how it works but I'm more concerned that as soon as I open the app I have 5+ signing requests that I have to blindly sign

I think you can initialize a random key for the user, and if they want to export database, you can let them set their own password (or PIN) to protect it.

The NIP-04 encryption is used to encrypt messages sent to the push server. This should eventually be updated to NIP-44 encryption, but the migration hasn’t started yet :(

443 is an MLS KeyPackage event, and by default generated & uploaded to the relay.

Thats what I was thinking of doing, but unfortunately having an encrypted sqlite db in the browser is really difficult :)

Do you think it would be better if the database encryption key was a password or pin provided by the user?

Also why does 0xchat ask to NIP-04 encrypt and sign 443 events when I open it? I thought it was only decrypting my DMs

0xChat’s approach is to store data unencrypted in the database, but the entire database itself is encrypted. When the app is opened, it only needs to decrypt the database once to access all the unencrypted content.

Fwiw coracle has the same thing. The tradeoff is storing dms unencrypted which I imagine would't really fly with whitenoise. Alternatively you could re-encrypt with a local key (since the bottleneck is really nip46), or keep a decrypted index to build list views, but store the actual messages encrypted

nostr:nprofile1qqs84k6jpsav0jmdeqjn2zxlpnsajaw6f8l0m2d4e9t8gjsyn53s4nspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumfv9khxarj9e3k7mgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmnyhat8ky

what to do when 0xChat is in an Amber loop of death?