An oldy, but a goody.

"In Capitalist America, Banks Own You"
https://cryptobriefing.com/goldman-sachs-tokenization-launch/?utm_source=tldrcrypto
I'm more interested in taking that control back. It centralized due to cost, not spam. Spamassassin is a very effective open source tool. The problem now is everyone blocks port 25 (cloud providers) so we're forced to "relay" through sendgrid/mailchimp. These days 1GB of storage costs $1/mo. Anyone should be able to run their own mailserver and block spam.
You tricked me! lol. I can literally only see the Ostrich.
Don't get too pumped about Trump speaking at this year's nostr:npub1rwh33t5x8n7czknhts5fg0v0fml8mkl7neaarksumkkf8d679qrqcz7avv, there are forces in motion that could severely impact the bitcoin industry if people don't begin to make noise.
Earlier today there was a Senate Agriculture Committee hearing on Oversight of Digital Commodities with the head of the CFTC that everyone should watch.
If the legislation that is inevitably going to come out of this hearing gets passed it won't matter if Trump gets into office. The industry will be hindered for years. There is bi-partisan support at the moment as Democrats are moving quickly to react to the buzz Republicans have received due to their embrace of bitcoin.
Long story short, this committee is pushing to give the CFTC regulatory oversight over spot bitcoin markets, which is an unprecedented expansion of CFTC authority into retail commodities trades whereas in the past they have exclusively had jurisdiction over only commodities derivatives markets.
If the CFTC is granted this expansion of authority it would mean that they are likely going to require any bitcoin company to register with the federal government and have enhanced KYC/AML requirements. To be clear, this won't only affect exchanges, but any company that touches spot bitcoin.
These efforts are being spearheaded on the crypto side via lobbying efforts by Kraken, Coinbase and Ripple. Not shocking because this would likely enable them to trivially erect regulatory moats.
It looks like the bi-partisan effort will be looking to pass something through the House and into law rather quickly. Likely before the election.
It is imperative that you speak out against this as it would increase the regulatory and compliance burdens on US bitcoin companies considerably. The best move right now is no action. We need less regulation, not more. As we've seen time and time again throughout the first 15-years of bitcoin, these regulations but users in harm's way and make it unreasonably difficult for companies to operate cheaply and effectively.
Call you Representative and tell them to reject any bill that would give the CFTC oversight over spot bitcoin markets. This is a full on attack.
Keep us informed Marty <3
Just wanted Crypto Townhall for the first time today. It was basically mainstream media in a twitter space.... Minus the BTC maxi interrupting an intelligent argument and throwing insults.
Mastodon is the biggest echo chamber if I ever knew one.
Here's your summary from The Coming Digital Dystopia with Charles Guillemet & Ian Rogers (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GYrvSOOlcU) on the What Bitcoin Did channel:
### TLDR:
The video discusses the importance of digital proof, freedom, and the challenges of surveillance in a more digital world.
### Key Points:
1. Charles Guillemet talks about the significance of cryptography in providing digital proof and security.
2. Ian Rogers emphasizes the need for tools that protect freedom of speech and data ownership in the face of increasing surveillance.
3. The discussion touches on the balance between freedom and surveillance in a more digital world.
#bitcoin #whatbitcoindid #cheatcode #football #bedford #freedomtech #podcasting #uk #ukbitcoiners nostr:npub1f4www6qjx43mckpkjld4apyyr76j3aahprvkduh9gc5xec78ypmsmakqh9 nostr:npub14mcddvsjsflnhgw7vxykz0ndfqj0rq04v7cjq5nnc95ftld0pv3shcfrlx
Not your keys....
"Ethereum network Ronin"?
You mean Axie Infinitie's L2?
Where is the actual crypto dating app?
Paypal is onboarding people you don't even know.
Does this mean farcaster is 2/3 "off-chain"?

Will ASIC's be economical enough to support distribution? I'm tired of plutocracy of miners.

