La naturaleza del poder político será siempre agresiva en tanto que no debe su existencia a una relación contractual, sino que esta autoridad debe ser impuesta (independientemente de que fuera una minoría o una mayoría la que legitimase el poder político).
Para sostener su fuerza, el poder político debe llevar a cabo un expolio fiscal contra aquellos que se ven incluidos dentro del marco en que este opera, con el fin de, al menos, sostener su poder.
Incluso si existiera un gobierno en el cual los gobernantes obraran con toda buena voluntad, y sin ningún ánimo de lucro, el poder político seguiría siendo un yugo fiscal agresivo contra sus ciudadanos, y por tanto ilegítimo.
The State has invariably shown a talent for the expansion of its powers.
It necessarily lives by confiscation of private capital, and since its expansion involves greater incursion on private individuals and enterprises, we must assert that State is inherently anticapitalist.
Te quieren hacer creer que el mercado son unos pocos hombres de traje, y que el Estado somos todos.
Es justamente al revés.
Man can obtain the means for satisfiying his desires through its own labor (economic means) and through the appropiation of others labor (political means).
The State is an organization of political means.
No State can come into being until economic means has created a definite number of objects for the satisfaction of needs, which objects may be taken away by warlike robbery.
The State was never created by "social contract"; it has always been born in conquest and exploitation.
Satoshi Nakamoto is a Male. It is specified in its bitcointalk profile.
Even if its a speudonimous if behind of that are thousands of people, Satoshi Nakamoto will always be MALE, because it is a speoudonimous
Satoshi Nakamoto is a Male. It is specified in its bitcointalk profile.
Even if its a speudonimous if behind of that are thousands of people, Satoshi Nakamoto will always be MALE, because it is a speoudonimous
Bitcoin maximalism has been here long before "the last few years". So if they forked their views the should be another thing.
Not all of them. And as I said before that was an unexpected event were most bitcoiners took it as good news in first place before thinking about it. Then many changed views in the topic
Yes cause people contradict themselfs all the time, they live in contradiction. Thats a human bug/feature
Ok the thread is closed. Everyone please leave the place
When it happened almost everyone. Now many think differently. We cant deny that it was somenthing totalky unespected
So you pay for a coinjoin service that you cant know if its private. I guess that with wasabi happens the same, rigth?
If you read the blog post you will discover their shitcoiner. They hid it well
getsession.org/blog/how-session-protects-your-anonymity-with-blockchain-and-crypto
Oxen is the token.
Permissionless and NoProfit but "Only nodes that have met the staking requirement (15000 OXEN) are allowed to participate in the network".
