Avatar
Sven, der junge Krieger
815922defcafb59e442c7656f3409203c6cae336b24bf72682cfa15a47105afb
»Sven« kommt aus dem altnordischen sveinn, Jüngling. Das schwedische sven bedeutet auch junger Krieger. Sven erinnert an den englischen swan und den schwedischen svan. Sven zeigt Wesenseigenschaften, die dem Schwan zugeschrieben werden. Dieser steht für Klarheit, Reinheit und Stolz. Schwäne sind gute Beobachter, was keine Kunst ist, wenn man den Kopf so hoch trägt. Sven hat eine weite Sicht auf die Dinge und wahrt den Überblick. Schwäne sind hervorragende Beschützer ihrer Nachkommen und in ihrer Art behütend. Auch Sven hat für soziale Notwendigkeiten einen Blick, der nicht auf die eigene Brut beschränkt ist.

"I would never join a platform like Nostr if there's no way notes can be deleted"

"Why is that?"

"Depending what kind of platform it wants to be, if you have content creators like on tiktok or Instagram and someone disagrees with what they say, on these platforms people go as far as finding out addresses and phone numbers and post them in the comments. Mods remove such things. If notes can't be deleted, such information stands there forever. It's dangerous and a no go"

Had a talk this morning following yesterday's discussions about safety on Nostr. This reply is hard to argue with. If you're a nym it doesn't concern you much. If you create "social media content" like videos or images and people even know or recognize you, they might do the worst things for the worst reasons and there currently is no way to prevent or stop that.

Thinking about this a lot today. It's a fine line between censorship resistance and people feeling safe to use the protocol in a way they see fit.

If we want to always have a couple of Bitcoin anons, ignore what I said. If we want mass adoption it's a topic we need to address.

Can it be addressed tho? Yes, but we would need to shift from absolute censorship resistance to something compromised. Maybe some community based reporting mechanism that relays comply with in terms of deleting said notes. We would still not have a central instance but the community guiding such things.

Should it be done? Up for discussion. Especially now that we have a main focus on the outbox model and blastr, it would make it way harder to implement something like that as notes get spread out on many relays that all would need to comply to some mechanism like that. Almost impossible if it's not a standard part of the protocol.

I know this is not a popular topic. I'm interested what people think about it tho.

At least I would like to be able to delete my own notes

True. I guess it’s so quiet in the media because the institutions want many coins cheaply.

Hodl, do not sell to institutions. Stay humble, keep your keys wisely. Learn to live a fulfilling life, if you remain humble, you are set up financially for life.

Real estate is really risky. Currency risk, state risk, neighborhood risk, tax risk, element risk.

But if you find the house you like to get old in, maybe you can buy ist in then get a cheap mortgage and buy back bitcoin. Stay humble, don't over leverage.

Fictional reserve banking

I recommend dealing with bitcoin, not because of the money.

But because it is the technology that brings us from the Middle Ages, in which humanity is socially located, to modernity.

Ich empfehle sich mit bitcoin zu befassen, nicht wegen dem Geld.

Sondern weil es die technologie ist die uns aus dem mittelalter, in dem die menschheit sich gesellschaftlich befindet, in die moderne bringt.

Real estate is really risky. Currency risk, state risk, neighborhood risk, tax risk, element risk.

But if you find the house you like to get old in, maybe you can buy ist in then get a cheap mortgage and buy back bitcoin. Stay humble, don't over leverage.

You said in a podcast that people find it difficult to imagine bitcoin because it is digital. A worthless physical btc coin helped me. You can hold them, take them with you, hide them, play with them.

Something to touch, a symbol. Maybe that will help your customers, too.

Your money in the bank is not yours, it is not in the bank and it is not money.

Dein Geld auf der Bank gehört dir nicht, es ist nicht in der Bank und es ist kein Geld.

One of the most common mistakes of our time is the belief that money and currency would be the same.

But this is only the ideal state and at the least since 1971 not the case and also before in phases not.

Currency is today the legally recognized means of payment, but does not meet all the characteristics of money.

What are the characteristics of money?

---

Einer der verbreitetsten irrtümer unser zeit ist der glaube das geld und währung das selbe wären.

Doch das ist lediglich der idealzustand und spätestens seit 1971 nicht der fall und auch davor phasenweise nicht.

Währung ist heute das gesetzlich anerkannte zahlungsmittel, erfüllt jedoch nicht alle eigenschaften von geld.

Welches sind die eigenschaften von geld?