I mean I looked it up just to answer the question. it seems like youāve thought about this a lot more than me š¤£
Iām less familiar with what cultural grounds you would use to propose such plans, but sure, sounds good.
probably would have been better to keep using Latin and, in doing so, not set the groundwork for local dialects and their cultural significance to go extinct/merge.
I mean the fact you can call it āBrazilā like itās still one thing shows itās nowhere near far enough.
dude Iām way beyond ānorth and southā. weāre talking Sicily, Calabria, Apulia, Naples, Rome/Papal States, Marche, Tuscany, Emilia-Romagna, Venice, Genoa, Lombardy, Piedmont ā¦ maybe even finer distinctions. these can be kingdoms if necessary/desired, I donāt really care.
Iām an Italian disunification maximalist. AMA.
I actually hadnāt thought about that in a while, but that was an eventful evening š
A Proof of Liabilities Scheme for Ecash Mints ā for Cashu
"This PoL scheme protects users specifically from an otherwise uncontrollable and undetectable inflation of the mint's ecash reserves."
I appreciate comments on this scheme, best per DM.
https://gist.github.com/callebtc/ed5228d1d8cbaade0104db5d1cf63939
my comment is that it sucks. boooooooo.
I swear to god, if you understand the difference between flows and stocks, you are grasp finance better than 90% of the industryās āprofessionalsā ā¦
I find the most charitable interpretation that assumes good faith is they are test nets for potential future bitcoin features and apps, whose technical contributors are unwittingly being milked by fraudsters.
a surprisingly large proportion of the technical bitcoin founders I speak to have only very slight variations of essentially the same story: āI got into eth first, played around, had a great idea, tried to implement it, couldnāt figure out why it wasnāt working, in the meantime learned more about economics, finance, energy, and distributed systemsā (i.e. the problems bitcoin actually solves), eventually saw the light, and here I am.ā
mrs allen on an idea I have for a talk:
āgive it in Riga, that will really slapā
itās not great but itās good, very funny, and worth knowing all the references that have seeped into popular culture.
you can always tell when people havenāt read Snow Crash because they say āthe Metaverseā unironically.
just cover the other nostril and blow real hard.
did you take that picture upside down? or stay upright but flip the camera? I has confuse.
NDK, version Ļ, now with more memes
nostr:npub1sfhflz2msx45rfzjyf5tyj0x35pv4qtq3hh4v2jf8nhrtl79cavsl2ymqt
please can every future version just add a digit of pi? that way you are still incrementing but also it stays funny forever.
I think you misunderstand my point. Iām not saying this *will* happen for xyz nonsense axiomatic reason. Iām saying that, as an individual making decisions, you should act as if everybody *can* ālower their time preference through learned self-restraint,ā even if that may not be true.
in fact Iād go further and say that successful group dynamics and the resolution of collective action problems to a large extent depends on it: people only cooperate and restrain from negative-sum violence at all when there is reason to believe that meaningful trust can create a positive-sum outcome. if you donāt believe you will be treated fairly because you are just a high-time preference idiot/idler/whatever then you wonāt develop or reciprocate any trust. hence for those who are low-time preference clever/industrious/whatever, the moral thing to do is to act as if this (probably to some extent true) underlying distribution is actually false.
Iād even go as far as to say that civilisation depends on the self-fulfilling inertia of this choice continuing to be made by a majority, if not a supermajority.
