Craig Wright, after successfully winning in court that he founded it.
This (many 0% offers) usually means that people are selling off and you're buying a local top, by the way.
Of course, if your objective is to stack corn, you don't give a fuck about that. As is my case.
But as I always say, if you're trying to use a P2P exchange lime Bisq for short term trading or something like that, you're not doing anything right.
nostr:note1288hdq7fuq4k4upczqqwa23mgfuw8esdhfm7wjwwa74suug539hswc9wup
It just takes one. Then, it's pure game theory.
We're just six months away from what I am convinced is THE singularity for bitcoin: Jan 1, 2025, the date where the BIS regulation kicks in allowing central banks to put up to 2% of their reserves in crypto (technically BTC but likely other stuff like ETH too).
Just Bisqed myself some corn. Fees are not insane right now and there are quite a few 0% premium offers. Go get some you fools.
Either one is in favor or changes like this, or in favor of specialized altcoins like Monero, to coexist with and be used together with Bitcoin.
I'd rather have anonymity by default on Bitcoin's base layer, but will use altcoins if necessary.
All the time. It's the best place to find accounts to follow and varied content. I also have the bridges to Mastodon and Bluesky, for those times I feel like getting angry at my screen.
I bet you they are not talking about mosques in MalmĂś.
The hardest but most necessary pill to swallow if you're a libertarian is that a vast majority of the people do not have any desire of being free -- because freedom cannot be detached from responsibility.
In my opinion, libertarians waste too much time theorizing why liberty is good, hoping to convince the people who will never be convinced. Instead, libertarians should worry a lot more about how to effectively protect themselves and their freedom from the self-subjugated and those who rule them.
I wish my close ones would allow me to use SimpleX.
NKYC, Bisq.
lol, Ursula von der Leyen is proposing something called "European Democracy Shield" where the governments will decide what is disinformation or not and remove it if they don't like it đ
https://blossom.oxtr.dev/fb4bb637fe42fde6c4b398cbc939d662c01176d49ec67dd586376bd5b1c16122.mp4
@note143rq474cgsvgajm5ja7h3ggkpywkzshupuczwnxgkpuk39egjujqcpmnju
Thanks! I can live with it xD
for now.
OK, could be as well. It's definitely not a hill I'm going to die on, defending the BBC xD
nostr:note1eqwzzphsqlj8m0hjsw6khcurhafj5e99uxahtrk4u55d8jflfq5sejz9k5Hm... while I do not reject the premise you propose, I don't think it applies to this case.
The piece is from the UK's state-run propaganda outlet (aka BBC), so as bad as it can possibly get. And if you read it, they go the length to make their alleged witness "Andrew" specifically say that he will keep his plan travels intact and get on another plane because "these are very rare occurrences".
Compare with the very last line of the article, where the propaganda machine is truly at work and the agenda becomes transparent:
"Research has shown that climate change will make severe turbulence more likely in the future."
They just can't help themselves.
Damn...
Key snippet: "there was a very dramatic drop so everyone seated and not wearing seatbelt was launched immediately into the ceiling"
I bet next time they will not simply ignore the belt light.
