Oh nozzle does that. In addition to being fast af that's one of the reasons I use it when I get relays figured out with nostros (nostros is like my technical nostr tool at this point lol)
IDK man, I'd rather create nothing than be someone who creates shitcoins XD.
I know you mean your music tho lol
Just a thread of Graphene OS devs being awesome.
"You're patching vulnerabilities and that's making it harder for us to break into it" is not a valid argument, but its the argument thats being made against them lol
How are you proving supply?
"The could be a hidden bug" is not the point, the point is you wouldn't detect it if it were exploited.
Its written in C++ which isn't considered memory safe (same as Bitcoin also written in C++).
Of course you guys could just fork over to a memory safe language.
So anyway, how are you proving supply?
The problem with growing block size is it harms the ability for independent node runners to continue (or start) running a node that verifies that their UTXOs belong to them and are on Bitcoin instead of trusting a 3rd party that may or may not run a fork of Bitcoin "Bitcoin crash" might be the name of that fork in this theoretical that definitely hasn't already happened.
In this hypothetical that definitely hasn't already happened, a few companies could change Bitcoin to fit their whims and desires as no grassroots userbase would be capable of opposing them.
We will solve this our own way (and the answer is not going to be e-cash or custodians)
I discovered this post.
Legit first thing when I opened the app
CN bug aside, I was actually thinking more about the buffer overflow bug on Bitcoin that was only caught because of global state auditability. If you guys encountered something similar, I don't see how you'd catch it.
Bro you guys hard fork on a whim and you can't prove the current supply of your coin because you can't prove a now patched inflation bug wasn't exploited before it was patched.
You could just ask why I think its a shitcoin you know.
No I just don't want rehypothecation or inflation bugs.
This might be able to shape up to be something a lot less custodial than originally designed.
Its interesting, but I'm still skeptical. The e-cash tokens even in this design are not provibly linked to a utxo. So rehypothecation is still a risk. Still, this is an interesting development.
"Bubble"? " Echo Chamber"? Nah I'm just hanging with the homes collaborating to solve real life problems.
Low stress and healthy blood pressure environment.
Make friends. Go to Bitcoin meetups. A friend or person at the meetup does, has, or can make thing you want. You ask to buy it with Bitcoin.
Boom. No bitpay lol
I went ahead and updated my zap address to blixt to help kill this narrative.
I only recently started using Blixt's lightning box feature to be fair, and I was keeping SN as my zap address because I observed better routes from the exchange I use to SN for some reason, but fuck it, just get better routes yourself.
Lightning box has Blixt always on in the background (which yes sucks battery life, might run the apk on desktop at some point) and gives you an lnurl.
nerd2ninja@blixtwallet.com will send directly to me, not a custodian.
Message me if you need help doing this yourself, but it is decently easy.
Monero is a shitcoin and ecash is a shit solution. "Who's side are you on" I'm on my side XD
Fuck custodians, improve the layers
How can Bitcoiners connect with Chocolate farmers?
THANK YOU someone said it.
A little louder for the short attention spans
"Trying to attract and hook users as fast as possible is venture capital exit strategy (aka scammer) thinking"
We don't operate as scammers operate and that's a good thing.
Undeservidly egotistical while getting in the way of his employees who have to appease him, while still getting real work not requested by him done?
As a non Amythyst user, I don't believe so.