Avatar
shmeech
83733967e834b1f4f1ed66ba45e1a41877daf262c426ec4be5cea161bb9cd8c1
Here for hyperB, fighting!

Thanks for the heads up on the scammer..

Even with people whom I love reading and following as a general rule there may be specific posts that don’t always match the kind of feed I want to get my consciousness wrapped up with at a given moment. That’s where the idea came from.

Here’s a likely useless idea that came to me for a nostr implementation: coloring posts?

Sometimes, I want to stop and read controversial posts that spark vicious debate (because the subject matter merits this), other times I prefer a feed that picks me up, or touches a poetic or philosophical nerve in me.

So, could the hive mind help me sort posts so I don’t get bombarded indiscriminately by posts that speak to all different moods, needs, etc. and I can more easily decide which vibes (colors) I want my attention to come in touch with at any given moment?

Could a “red rated” post speak to my interest in engaging with or stimulating my interest in controversial discussion on sensitive topics where sparks are bound to fly, while a “blue rated” post could give my agitated self a way to focus on posts that vibe poetry and beauty?

Is that a realistic way to organize one’s feed, and have an easy visual cue for what one gravitates to at any given moment?

There could be so many other colors: yellow light hearted and orange a combination of red and yellow. Maybe there is even a way to make the connection between colors and moods non arbitrary?

The intensity of colors indicating the degree to which people agree on the mood, the mix indicating ambiguity?

I’m a total layperson in all areas that could help understand whether this makes any sense at all or where it falls short, so let’s just say:

Is there a feasible way I may be able one day to order my feed in a way that adds a visual component so it’s easy to see posts that are in line with what my higher self requires? Healthy feeds through choice and empowerment instead of the incentive of toxicity that we have grown so accustomed to?

Goes out to nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc nostr:npub1hk0tv47ztd8kekngsuwwycje68umccjzqjr7xgjfqkm8ffcs53dqvv20pf nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft

Thanks!!

Meanwhile, German speaking community is strongest of all: don’t need the guv to secure their future.

My mind, my choice✊🏻

Like walker, like crawler.

That can’t be it. Locals are not the only ones who will be forced to acquire LTP (not going the easy route of assigning blame externally), also tourist behavior will eventually ebb and cause a market self-correction of an oversaturated situation. But then, local politicians are going to politic… LTP also means understanding others’ HTP actionism, allowing it to play out, opting out, learn, prepare, and be compassionate.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Some people have grown cynical with democracy (and various types of representative government broadly, e.g. including constitutional democratic republics that enshrine certain rights to protect liberty against the masses), viewing this method as promoting short-term leadership with bad incentives.

I have a different take.

Prior to the printing press and then the telegraph and radio, running a democratic society over long distances wasn’t even feasible. The concept of having people democratically participate in their government relies on people being relatively connected information-wise so that they can use their access to information to know what’s happening and to then select between different options, which you couldn’t do across the entirety of a country before people were literate and election materials or other publications could be mass produced. In the pre-press age of handwritten books, making written documents was expensive, and so literacy was a niche skill.

So, that era was ruled by kings and queens, council oligopolies, and so forth. Representative government, to the extent that it existed, only applied to small city states where people could literally gather in a town square, or to “elites” in a capital. There was literally no way to run an election over very broad distances on a regular basis. The printing press helped change that, and then the telegraph, radio, and other tech further reinforced it.

But ironically, as I discuss in Broken Money, those technologies also started to break our money. The printing press and telegraph allowed the transaction layer (the movement of IOUs between individuals and entities) to grow exponentially more efficient both domestically and globally, while our settlement layer (gold) remained basically unchanged. This broadening gap between fast transactions and slow settlements was increasingly bridged with centralization and credit, and the gap eventually became so wide that every nation dropped the settlement layer of gold almost entirely, except as a reserve asset.

So the same technologies that enabled widespread representative government also enabled the proliferation of softer money. Prior to these technologies, broad democracy wasn’t possible. And after these technologies, sound money was too slow to keep up. Oof.

But over a long enough timeframe, our technology became good enough that we finally figured out how to do fast settlements as well. Bitcoin. People can send value to each other quickly over long distances, in ways that no central entity can prevent or reverse, and with a unit that no central entity can debase. The first sound money of the Information Age.

If Bitcoin is successful over the coming decades and becomes a much larger and less volatile money, than it is now, fully entrenched in society, then that would be the first era where technology is at such a state where broad democracy and fast sound money can coexist. Or put more universally, it will be the first era where information spreads quickly without breaking the money, and thus both fast information and good money could coexist.

I, for one, would be curious to see how that develops.

Broader democracy with less significance of borders or geographical limits of legislation means more decision power the closer you get to your own location, which is the way it should be, right? No need for globally unifying policy to be decided democratically when geographical arbitrage comes into play. Am I on the right track?

One thing that is not happening: Cardano

Science-ist create liquid banks; a tank full of water and micro-parasites that could be an alternative to banks in urban areas.