I prefer custodial vs self-custodial.
The term “non” implies absence or lacking a characteristic and thus can be confusing or even perceived negatively in this context, specially for people who are just learning.
“If you give your seed phrase over the phone then you don’t deserve it” nostr:note14qremgdht7kpvymmaezhds2wmw42l89z0hcspjg2n4cn6ljcu5vsn0nush
Do you think there are girls in Nostr? 😹
What if 130+ is the bottom quintile not too far away in the future?
Then always build for that quintile in mind.
The existing Nostr clients are unfortunately just a copy of Twitter, with “features” like endless scrolling. Nothing creative UX wise yet but hopefully comes soon..
You used to post funny memes.. I get it, you are evolving somewhere and thus your account is evolving too, and the message is important. Sure. But by dropping the humor you’re losing the punch ;)
If you are eating tacos you’re helping the bad guys launder money 🌮
We don’t see you either but at least we know you have a dog 🐶😅
You’re so articulate 👏🥳
Wise words.. nostr:note1rae3r6dygdta0ws8qhy3zfvcpa3aeae2j0a02lastv7avayeaugqzlyjjr
Listened to Michael Saylor on the nostr:npub1r8l06leee9kjlam0slmky7h8j9zme9ca32erypgqtyu6t2gnhshs3jx5dk podcast. It's 3 months old, but sheds some light on the ARK funding story.
TL;DW: Saylor strongly believes in *OSSIFICATION NOW*. From that POV, protocol development is a liability.
Some quotes (and thoughts)👇
"You only get to play God once. And Satoshi played God. And you can say 'well Satoshi got to do it, why can't I?' Well the answer is Satoshi did it, the reason we're talking about Satoshi is 'cause the other 100,000 would-be Satoshis failed. If you read the history of the world, work your way through 10,000 pages of Western history, there will be thousands and thousands and thousands of episodes of 'alpha male thinks he was put on this earth, you know, to change everything', full of hubris [...] he's gotta do more, change more, etcetera.'" (53:34) "Bitcoin Core developers, or protocol developers, they want to fix something, or they want to make a contribution, because it's in their DNA, but developers are just the lawyers of cyberspace. When a lawyer shows up at the capital, they gotta make a law to save you from yourself, and the more laws they make, the more they cripple the economy, until eventually there's so many laws that the entire civilization collapses under its own weight." (58:06) "The world is full of people that need something to do. I would say, the real key to wisdom, channel your energy constructively. If you're gonna do something, improve Lightning, build an application, persuade someone to adopt Bitcoin as a reserve asset, educate someone… these are all constructive things. Destructive, dilutive, distractive things are: fight with random people 'cause they want to fight with you, attack the core network and make it confusing and introduce anxiety, and confusion and fear, uncertainty and doubt into the base layer. Right? And then attempt to imprint your ego, you know, on the base protocol, you know? Like, 'I gotta introduce this so my name will go down in history forever'." (2:38:55) My view: it's understandable to want Bitcoin to behave like the granite under Manhattan (his analogy); a solid bedrock that never changes. Especially if you truly believe Bitcoin will take over the world as SoV-only and "there is no second best". But IMO this is wishful thinking. While I agree it's near-impossible for an alt to overtake Bitcoin, I do think adoption could stall.
Luckily, Bitcoin isn't really a natural element. It's spontaneous order, more like language. Hard to change and no one can dictate changes, but if market wants it to change, it can.
Furthermore, despite Stephan asking a few questions in that direction, Saylor mostly failed to distinguish between protocol upgrades and general software maintenance.
Arguing against any hard/soft forks is one thing, but Bitcoin Core 26.0 can obviously not last for centuries...
Having said that, Saylor is of course free to not upgrade anymore and stick to Bitcoin Core 26.0 for as long as he lives.
BITCOIN DOESN’T CARE WHAT ODELL THINKS!!!
Saylor has shown he is a clever man with a lot of skin in the game. All those reasons stated there are pretty valid.
People criticising him right for this, might have too much ego themselves. Critics pretend they have studied and thought about Bitcoin more than he or anybody has.
Base layer shouldn’t be mess around too much regardless if your hero is Saylor or Odell.
Slay your heroes! nostr:note1t58456vay29vuu4c8zvk0sq3m6aflw679htp7yh5sp9xg4rc27lqynu33w
I think you are somehow right in your speculation, if Saylor is behaving that way is probably because if too many grants get assigned to core devs, then those devs might feel the need to perform all types of changes and start thinking of roadmaps, etc. Justify their grants sort of!
Plus it will attract other devs like flies. Do we really want to have devs who are there only/mainly for the money? It’s a dilemma! Some food for thought nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx




