he made a site to check which relays have a note, it didnt work well for me tho
Is #[0] covertly sabotaging nostr by discouraging edits?
the point is we can choose if we want to use anothers mutes,reports,etc
nostr is about choice, and that includes letting groups censor together, fact is without very effective curation nostr will be quickly over run with spam and people wont use it over bigtech, if we want to defeat bigtech we must do everything better, including moderation
nostr can become more censorship resistant as clients can find and use all relays, become p2p etc
the left likes to misuse words, aka redefine them, by thinking of them in words that are more accurate may we get a clearer picture of whats what
real socialism would be voluntary as seen in families or insect colonies
rent seekers in society, those that dont produce but just take
what a privilege banks have being able to make new money and take interest on it?
context would indicate someone has been incorrectly labelled a bot, for example others liking their posts or replying to them, we could then counter label them as say not a bot and maybe label the persons labelling them a bot as false labellers etc, some way the truth will come out, point is you cant ultimately be stopped here if anyone else wants to see you
a network of gettos is hard on nostr to occur as the content is self sovereign, the problem currently is people finding others than want plus clients backing up and restoring content perhaps automatically
abandoning gold backed currency is where the west went wrong
i just use iris in brave on android, maybe try refresh? iris has been doing some weird things tho like with profile feeds
i think filtering and speed of interactions should be focuses in clients
i pointed out to #[6] and #[7] that each has good points #[8]
iris is my favourite client followed by amethyst, what do you think of iris?
i think iris might be doing something with reports #[6] ?
the fact that we have many clients and they can try what ever they want means nostr can evolve faster than anything before, it may be the most important aspect of what nostr is, the dev model, in fact many aspects of dev communication are already on nostr, so expanding into github's area seems obvious
its not actually block lists but reports aka reactions to notes
i am down for that, if a group doesnt like zap spam they get together and filter it out, same for any other group left right etc
delegated blocking can work very well as long as we have methods to check for bad blocking anf override it
interesting question
so you make using their blocklist optional, there is people that will only hide real spam not people they disagree with