Force Touch the zap button

My bullish business case for Nostr.

https://michaelantonfischer.com/nostr-the-hidden-advertising-champion

If you have valuable content, people will try to find you. And certainly free minded people will continue to run uncensored aggregator relays.

Which btw you can do on your own relay. Just publish to every relay that you can find.

Well, like all the people claiming Nostr isn’t censorship resistant you are redefining what censorship means.

Censorship is when you are blocked from communicating with an audience that is consenting to listen.

In this case you are not at all hindered in doing that.

Of course it may. This is a first in history. Never in recorded history before have we deliberately invented a money from scratch.

Still, my base case is that this thing goes the way of all other disruptions.

Especially since that price target doesn’t include Fiat printing nor economic growth.

Well, throwing you out from a NIP-05 is not censoring, how does it keep you from spreading your message?

And while I certainly don’t agree with what you said, I think you should be free to say it.

Just don’t expect everyone to be comfortable with it or being willing to verify your account if you say it.

He’s not really censoring you, he just doesn’t want the association. Which is understandable.

Where I live what you said is a criminal offense.

I can go about 4, but poor family, just too many kids and to many stories lost to the wars.

Bitcoin is at aprox 2% the steep part of the adoption curve usually starts between 5-10% and ends at 90-95%

Not cool. You shouldn’t report a thought crime no matter how serious.

You won’t fix a wrong if a 100x bigger wrong.

Well, but if Bitcoin reaches 90% adoption by 2035 then it should have a marketcap in the order of magnitude I suggested.

And that is just by purchasing power, nominal is basically guaranteed. Even Druckenmiller forecasts the USD to be obsolete by 35

So far every halving has added a zero and the steep part of the s-curve is not even here, yet.

So you confirmed my question? This is all so confusing…

Because inventions that cross the threshold of viability either go s-curve up or s-curve to zero.

Not aware of any historical evidence for a third option.

No, exponential growth. Maybe I am off by 5 years, but by more not. Either bitcoin is a disruption than it will reach 90% adoption in the next 20 years or it isn’t and it will be dead by then.

I don’t know of a single disruption that didn’t follow the s-curve.

Is opening lids the one thing even hardcore feminists rely on men for?

Come on, by 2035 surely one sat will at least have the purchasing power of $.50 today.

It’s so sad that children don’t understand that Nostrica is more important than them.

I only mute on three conditions:

1. I have proof they knowingly lied.

2. They repeatedly refuse to stick to logic.

3. Repeated use of insults instead of arguments.

Cannot be. I said 42. That is definitely the answer.