Beat you to this:
https://michaelantonfischer.com/united-states-of-bitcoin-how-the-us-can-save-their-empire
Don’t you dare call your next book “Bitcoin Nation”. I am writing this.
Then build privacy tools on Bitcoin. Don’t advocate for 💩coins and especially don’t lie about your favorite 💩coin or bitcoin
Sigh…
Doesn’t at all debunk what even getmonero.org admits
BuT yUo CaN aUdIt MoNeRo SuPpLy
No bag holders, you can’t, as your own website admits you couldn’t detect a bug that actually affected Zcash.
So for all we know your 💩coin is already inflating
A monero node cannot audit total supply bag holder 😂
So the Monero bag holders crawled out again showing that they neither understand Bitcoin nor Monero.
#[0]
Nice, we are at the point where discussion always ends, with Monero heads making up stuff.
No, range proofs insure you not against an inflation bug.
And a layer 2 in this case is the opposite of compromise. You don’t compromise the main layer, thus using a layer 2.
And no, the supply is not twindling. Lost coins are dormant, this doesn’t hurt monetary function at all. It would only be the case if coins were actively taken out of wallets or added in.
And even if, they are pegged to a dying currency.
No, you imply he was an idiot, because he explained exactly why ledger needs to be public.
If supply isn’t stable, it’s not a viable money. Monero doesn’t solve this issue. For all we know Monero already has an inflation bug.
Everything monero tries to solve can be built on lightning without compromising the money.
GPT-4 is scary…
I use it to help proofread my upcoming book “Bitcoin Nation” and it's uncannily good. In fact, it's at least on par with all the humans I have worked on text with thus far.
Of course, it still has some quirks. E.g., it forgets after a few thousand characters what we are doing, so with every new section I feed it, I need to remind it, “Please continue to proofread”.
But besides that, it does it and unlike humans, it sticks exactly to the level of rewriting and correction that I tell it to use.
The scary bit?
Occasionally, GPT decides to continue the segments I give it, especially if I end a chapter with a rhetorical question, which is a bad habit of mine.
And TBH, sometimes I need to check my own text to see whether I have written this bit or not.
GPT-4 is so good at mimicking my style that it can impersonate me, even to myself.
This is the stablecoin equivalent of full-reserve banking backed by bitcoin.
#Bitcoin-backed dollars have an opportunity to be the single greatest Trojan horse we have to reduce reliance on the fiat system.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/world-needs-bitcoin-backed-stablecoins
Stable coins are way too risky for me.
No, Monero is not cash at all. It doesn’t solve the problems that a cash needs to solve, Monero is unauditable, Inflation bugs are undetectable.
This is why Satoshi built Bitcoin the way he built it. If you think Monero is cash, you say satoshi was an idiot, since he was very much aware of the options Monero choose, but purposely didn’t use because he knew why previous eCash systems failed.
If you understood how great the breakthrough of Bitcoin is, you’d be working on Lightning and not Monero.
So it is an IQ test indeed, but the results are the opposite of what you think. You advocating for Monero shows that you never understood Bitcoin’s innovation to begin with.
No true Bitcoiner gets along with Monero Bros and every Monero advocate must argue that Satoshi was at least some part idiot.
Monero is a coin that ignores the innovation Satoshi made and thinks it can do a better money without actually solving the problems satoshi solved.
A big bowl of cereal with soy milk sounds much nicer though 🤷
@saltndaisy make great Bitcoin granola.
If his twitter hasn’t been hacked, he is
Hard to tell if artist or AI these days, but this looks like Midjourney.
You’re late, you need to tap us all a late fee now 😉
Da ist ein Fehler drin. 100,000 deposit führt zu 1-2 Mio Loan