How about
“ ₿640 ≐00,860,000 “
But replace ≐ with the full https://satsymbol.com symbol?
Just saw microstrategy using it today!

Credit: https://twitter.com/samcallah/status/1654129163048026113?s=20
#[2] also notice there’s no confirmation before image is uploaded, did that idea get scraped? Accidental tap on the wrong image would upload the wrong image publicly and instantly :(
How about
“ ₿640 ≐00,860,000 “
But replace ≐ with the full https://satsymbol.com symbol?
Just saw microstrategy using it today!

Credit: https://twitter.com/samcallah/status/1654129163048026113?s=20
Can relays not just require some POW attached to notes to accept them? As long as there is a real cost somewhere along the line, spam is disincentivized
Can start computing right from first app screen while user configures account, agrees to terms, writes profile bio/name etc, chooses UI theme etc
Why not a new NIP that requires some POW to generate a valid npub/nsec pair? Anything that doesn’t put in enough work auto seen by clients as spam. Just need a loading bar on account creation as phone does some computing, like trying to get a custom looking npub but actually useful. #[5] does this for contacting him via website form. Has to upgrade difficulty occasionally but works I think
Fair, for my part I don’t think it makes sense at all to use sats for anything over 9.99 btc (999 million sats).
Your original post, 60 billion 400 million sats, at that point the unit stops being intuitive again. Once the denomination leaves “million” it becomes unwieldy.
Maybe someday some local ML categorization on upload? nostr:note12a4m633rufcx8px8dnfmtdd4vn2xf34nl7mtprad6gqm39t768sqgh3wcf
nostr:note10d9fukl2xr6k3eczp6973u6a7ja9j3mt43uf0vlsmvp5lfmr2mes4ykrpl
#[0] since measuring inflation seems to be more subjective than objective, instead of comparing bank failures in inflation-adjusted terms, how about comparing failures as a % of M2 at time of failure. Think this metric could be useful?
Any way to play this audio faster than 1x?
Users could subscribe to your default feed or modify what they see it to exclude certain of your sub feeds
Hmmm yes. I like the idea of adding additional (poster defined) feeds. Then users can just enable or disable various feeds when viewing a profile’s content. #[7] unit default feed on profile would include all notes but you could define various sub feeds that you can add *or remove* posts from. Idk if this can fall under a currently existing nip/kind. You can, while drafting a post or afterwards, add a note to one of your custom feeds. And later remove or recategorize (update the sub feed list of note IDs?).
Can be more than keywords too. Can filter down to notes that include only defined npubs to view conversations only between them, with or without keywords. With or without media etc. I’m imagining going to #[5] ‘s profile and changing the filter to only show posts that include both his and #[6] npubs and “nostrasia” to view any convo you’ve all had about this topic
Guess I have little faith in the posters tagging their content well or consistently. In favor more of reader side keyword filters
But reader defined categories/filters or hardcoded categories posters must tag posts under?