Custom filters on feeds all throughout the app is a better approach. I should be able to filter out any posts by x npub(s) that include whatever keyword I choose. For example if I want only short form #[6] content I could set up a filter on his npub hiding ‘lopp.net’ so all his article posts aren’t shown. Or could do same for #[7] and ‘meat’ or ‘walk, walking’
Any way to include some data that ‘timestamps’ a note to the current block height? Sounds like something ZK proofs (aka magic) could do, prove a block height timestamp was the maximum block height at the time the proof was computed? Maybe requires these timestamps to be rolled-up and the proof included in that block tho? Time is so…relative.
Maybe use SFSafariViewController instead of sending users out of your app entirely to Safari proper?
Perhaps we’ll see exciting things soon:
nostr:note16vh280s3lt40c62c9a3e7t54v7923jsg9u669rad4ch7u9tvsytq0jtljw
Hm why not mark them as pre-release in that case?
!!! I was wondering why sometimes I’d not be able to see what a post was replying to
#[0] “Twitter threads are already pretty hard to follow because they aren't nested very well. One feature I like about Reddit, for example, is that I can collapse entire subthreads with a single click if I want to look for other discussions on a given post. The whole threading system could benefit from an overhaul rather than just slapping a naive prioritization rule on it.” -https://blog.lopp.net/a-critique-of-twitter-changes/
Hear hear. Nostr needs help here too. #[1] I think this should be a higher priority! Can make the world of difference on actually making conversations and the network stronger.
😔 hyphen broke the link? Sigh. https://blog.lopp.net/a-critique-of-twitter-changes/
#[0] “Twitter threads are already pretty hard to follow because they aren't nested very well. One feature I like about Reddit, for example, is that I can collapse entire subthreads with a single click if I want to look for other discussions on a given post. The whole threading system could benefit from an overhaul rather than just slapping a naive prioritization rule on it.” -https://blog.lopp.net/a-critique-of-twitter-changes/
Hear hear. Nostr needs help here too. #[1] I think this should be a higher priority! Can make the world of difference on actually making conversations and the network stronger.
Agree, why isn’t it simply a user choice, even if the default is on
I get the whole image debate but why aren’t polls more widely supported?
nostr:note16f2qkdv36szyt4x74ujt0x2z99pjyuapnw2czaz7kl8089vflq5qp2algt
I would only use it with throwaway accounts for customer service help or something. #[2] way better for actual private chats
Decentralized timestamps are a tricky thing tho.. any way to put decryption info into bitcoin block but can only be read at a future block height? #[4] timestamp scholar, thoughts?
#[2] is worthy of exploration. https://simplex.chat
Oo or make it private zaps only, encrypted with a key unique to that post, keys to view only get revealed to public after it’s over
Lol but this could be a cool automated raffle program if you ‘sold’ fixed denomination zap entries and chose a random one to win. Say you need to submit the zap on a particular relay to enter, find some cryptographically random way to select a winner from among the zaps, could be built into the app open source like a poll or any other type of unique note… but if I were you I’d not build or operate this except as a nym; see history of satoshi dice
Paid for with your own money no matter the size or up to the amount gained from non winning zaps? This is like a lightning powered raffle drawing!
This is certainly not optimal and I hope it doesn’t stay this way