Yo nostr:npub1ltt9gry09lf2z6396rvzmk2a8wkh3yx5xhgkjzzg5znh62yr53rs0hk97y,
I love your work, and this flow chart of yours is one of my favourite Bitcoin explainers.
Science is using data to verify and challenge existing hypothesis.
Semmelwies saved lives doing this, but died an outcast. 
Flowers are a depreciating asset
Great chat!
Bitcoin Review Podcast BR036 Lightning Privacy & Splice Panel ft. Tbast, Dusty, Tony, Jeff & Vivek https://bitcoin.review/podcast/episode-36/
Dusty is a cool, smart guy. I look forward to listening to this one.
Bitcoin is at risk if a bad actor can simultaneously get access to:
1. More energy, AND
2. More ASICs
So I'm thinking more about your reply.
You are saying that if lots of energy is being used in mining that makes people more confident in Bitcoin, and therefore adoption increases?
The block reward is the sum of fees (shown as "sats per byte" in the diagram), plus subsidy.
Block space usage has GONE DOWN over the last 3 or 4 months (as tokens have pushed out jpeg's)

So bearish on demand for block space, Ha ha!
Super hard to know. But if I had to bet, Epoch 6
^^^This guy gets it.
I'm interested in you thoughts on this flow diagram showing economic incentives:

Not your keys, not your coins.
I heard a sad story today about a colleague who got tied up in Luna.
Difficulty adjustment down??? Where are the miners?

You are probably right.
I like to ponder the future, when the subsidy gets much smaller. How much will fees be then? What year will fees be consistently greater than subsidy?

