Fine, but what’s the incentive for the massive holders to spend it. Say BTC gets to the market cap of SPX. 33.36 trillion dollars, and it will have to get much bigger than that. The top wallets would be trillionaires many times over. What’s their incentive to “spend” it. The more they hold, the more they’re worth. It’s still leaves “peanuts” for the little guy.

Oh that’s cool! Yeah I know ChatGPT, very cool. I like this one a lot, good stuff and thanks!

Except they don’t necessarily. ETH is certainly a contender.

Fair points. But the vast majority of wealth (meaning control. Political control, economic control, etc) is still in the hands of the lucky few. This isn’t merit based, it’s ambiguous luck. Right place, right time. I’m all for a “inequality” in holding, though this distribution seems ripe for abuse from the powerful.

Pretty closed minded, no?

This one may stir up the hornets nest. Is bitcoin really decentralized when the vast majority of BTC is concentrated In just a few wallets. Aren’t we simply trading one overlord for another?

Care to enlighten me? openAI art? Probably a little behind

This is awesome!

This is a note transmitted over a relay

I'm noticing the mention of "Twitter Coins" here in Nostr. Is this a thing? Has there been an announcement? If so where?

Zaps is clearly better. But being better is not the only reason for winning. The battleground is still the same: normies must join (which they ultimately will) but implementations like this prolong this process.

Twitter's new Twitter coins will essentially function like Nostr Zaps, allowing you to tip each Tweet, providing value for each Tweet. The amount of coins will be tallied and shown on each Tweet as well. 150 coins for $1.99.

Stoked to get back down there soon

Not much more you can do for them. Pass on the info and let them decide what they do with it.

Nostr probably

You cannot change your twitter name frequently. That is really frustrating.