Javascript is the easiest way to get going, and there are lots of web clients out there (particularly in svelte). I've got lots of issues open at https://github.com/coracle-social/coracle/issues if you want to contribute to Coracle. Otherwise, you can find a list of projects here: https://github.com/aljazceru/awesome-nostr
One way you might consider contributing is by building data vending machines, in particular I'd be interested in one for search.
Planning to look into it, but it seems like most people don't really know what they're recommending, so I'm not sure if the hype is warranted or not. It looks like you might work on Session chat? Do you guys use SimpleX over there?
nostr:note1wgfl3t06vzxatqxl03nk4qmf4zdul0cq435x9vvr5wwup8td7efs0wjjgp
That is, Forward Secrecy and Post-Compromise Security.
Do you take hour long showers or... I guess you are a frog though
This is why web is better, you don't have to re-invent text selection, media sharing, scrolling, etc. I've never done mobile development, but it sounds like a chore.
nostr:nprofile1qqsraae80hqgwryvql0saeng9xfgxq0tj4u9w9dpfupj4jjnfp3t4cqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsqs7amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6tukfgc what's the status of implementation of NIP 112 in Arcade City? I want to make sure I'm not proliferating standards with NIP 87. Do you have any opinions on their relative merits?
nostr:note1rul6s38d577yhn38qtwljam5pslsfxrj37vcw3jkuz476wjljyeq0mz7d0
NIP 87 currently leaves membership up to a single admin. This is a high level of trust. A strong authority can keep culture within a group coherent, limiting the likelihood of a group split. Members can also leak the key with some effort to invite other members. Basically, no guarantees hold. Voting on membership might be an improvement in social terms, but MLS even says below that this would happen at the application layer, not cryptographically, and goes into some complex detail about how to handle member-managed admission.
Wait, Marx is Nostr's favorite philosopher? That can't be right π
My #1 priority right now is to get encrypted DM's and group chat working. nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xwdmg2sa 's proposal is nearing completion, but it requires a solid foundation of NIP 44 cryptography and NIP 59 wrapping.
If you have opinions on either of these, please chime in! I have written a summary issue here:
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/717
My personal goal is to have NIP 44 and 59 in a final-ish state by the end of today so we can finalize NIP 24 as early as next week along with implementations in Amethyst, Snort, 0xChat, and Coracle. We'll of course wait to merge until we have worked through all feedback.
I'm also working on PRs for adding NIP-44 support to nostr:nprofile1qqsyv47lazt9h6ycp2fsw270khje5egjgsrdkrupjg27u796g7f5k0spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3kamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu339e682mnwv4k8xct5wvhxxmmdqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsqxk3rc and nos2x. If anyone out there maintains a signer application, please look into adding support sooner rather than later. It will be amazing to get everyone off of NIP 04.
I'm not trying to rush this because there's a bounty out, I'm just trying to keep the momentum we currently have built up. The bounty IMO should be shared among all early implementations and contributors. nostr:nprofile1qqs9336p4f3sctdrtft2wlqaq5upjz9azpgylhfd3dplwf005mfrr9spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3wamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvekhgtnhd9azucnf0gq32amnwvaz7tm9v3jkutnwdaehgu3wd3skueq5rp9j7
nostr:note1ah66kqntuezan5jcpq59cu4sd9lc9rpqx74x8tvp0m8yfxllk3ysfjxuc9
I think the purpose of this is so that it's impossible to know if someone has been invited to a group. In NIP-87, invitations are addressed to your real public key, but the sender is obscured. This seems like an ok tradeoff.
Authority is much broader than kingship. Fatherhood is a much stronger example than kingship in my book.
Yes, that's a very good point. I'm on team "king", but only just, exactly because of this.
Lol I love seeing Trump do things he would never be able to do in real life, keep em coming




nostr:note1pwr4saf6m8p6r9eqp56mnxvt5kxalqv69e7nwyfnaetk4ejha2rsx6nsap
