dubs
every time i say arugula my daughter laughs hysterically and it is just the best thing ever
i should have turned off likes before posting this, now i’m getting the old ack
12 sats is the new ack
hahah, i know that phase well. it’s taken me a very long time to get to this point. i should really have more to show for it tbh 😅
the key is a very specific milk texture and temp.
gm #coffeechain 
this is perfect. 🌙 ✨
it’s going to be worth it
one of these days i’m actually going to move all my stuff off fold.
roping ppl in with incredible rewards and then rugging is a very effective retention strategy. banking relationship is incredibly sticky
oh do you not participate in the circular zap economy? you’re zapping out of pocket? 😬
here’s some sats to hopefully help you get started! pass it on 🤝
you could have just zapped me 12 sats instead of posting this word salad
is zapping 12 sats passive aggression
gm we’re prepping pucks to the highest degree #coffeechain
intrinsic in the sense that they are naturally part of the timechain by way of valid L1 transactions and can be seen on a block explorer.
i don’t think jpeg inscriptions are that cool personally but where it gets interesting for me is other forms of media and even compiling software that is stored immutably on-chain.
LN is an L2. inscriptions are written on the base layer.
maybe this is a hot take but i think it would be a worse look for bitcoin magazine to demonize inscriptions and not engage with it.
inscriptions follow consensus rules and are a part of bitcoin and the culture (like it or not), which is what the magazine reports on.
taking a hard stance against something that is intrinsic to the protocol would be weirdly biased and authoritarian coming from a magazine whose mandate is to report on bitcoin and anything related to it.
i’m sure they’d platform opposing views on inscriptions if anyone wanted to offer a compelling and objective argument, but it seems like most people just want to screech and complain.