Avatar
Hypno Kitty
99d74f5fe276a422eb83f39087e027732ff485642ff54cc849e06596310cab21
Toxic bitcoiner. Also a gay, atheist, gun-owning, psychedelic-using freedom maxi. Deal with it.

So happy I inspired you. So far (24 hours in) things are working without a hitch.

I have a start 9 node and on that, I had to uninstall bitcoin core and install bitcoin knots. I think maybe you can run both simultaneously on other nodes, like umbrella. In any event, bitcoin knots works seamlessly with both Damus and Sparrow.

Replying to Avatar Obscura VPN

Today is the day: Obscura VPN is NOW AVAILABLE!

Obscura is the first VPN that:

- CAN'T log your activity by design

- Outsmarts network filters

We believe Obscura sets the standard for a new generation of VPNs, and hope you’ll check it out!

🔗 https://obscura.net/

----

Contrary to popular belief, traditional VPNs (even “no-log” ones) can track you – they see both who you are and what you do, just like your ISP.

Your ISP is no better. Since 2017, they've been able to legally sell your sensitive data.

Obscura is different – we never see your decrypted internet packets in the first place.

It’s simply impossible for us to log your internet activity, even if we were compelled to, or if our servers were compromised.

We achieve this by using a fully-independent exit hop run by @mullvadvpn. Ensuring that our servers never see your traffic, and the exit hop never sees your identity.

In fact, you can check your connected server’s public key against those listed on Mullvad’s server page!

But that’s not all…

You may have had the frustrating experience of trying to use your VPN on a restrictive WiFi: in an airport, a hotel, or certain jurisdictions.

Other VPNs will often fail to connect, as their off-the-shelf protocol is easily detected and blocked.

With Obscura, we built our own custom stealth protocol that is much harder to block.

Our protocol blends in with regular internet traffic using the same technology that powers HTTP/3 – QUIC – making it much harder for censors or network filters to detect or block.

To celebrate our launch, Obscura is just $6/month.

Our team has put in the hours to make this all a seamless experience, and I hope you’ll take Obscura for a spin.

🔗 https://obscura.net/

Thanks for reading, and I’ll see you on the free and open internet. 🏄

P.S. For those looking for an exploration of our technical choices, here's our blog post! https://obscura.net/blog/bootstrapping-trust/

You had me at posting on Nostr

Holy shit, I just got a Bit Axe today, downloaded datum onto my Start 9 and now I'm mining on Ocean using my own block templates. Amazingly easy to set up. Thanks nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcwac93l , nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4sh8dmel , and everyone else at nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgstcvu4w who made this so easy. Proud to be contributing to the decentralization and censorship resistance of Bitcoin.

It's about time we got some militant disco voices on Nostr.

Power to the plebs... is what I meant to say.

Replying to Avatar Trey Walsh

Just concluded nostr:npub1fpcd25q2zg09rp65fglxuhp0acws5qlphpg88un7mdcskygdvgyqfv4sld's first board meeting 🧡

Excited for the future with our growing cause and organization ✨

Bitcoin needs progressive advocates. It's for everyone

Replying to Avatar Troy Cross

Been thinking about Dhruv Bansal’s idea that bitcoin are not produced or generated — wrong way of thinking about it induced by “mining” metaphor — but rather all bitcoin existed from the moment the network was launched, but are auctioned off to miners as a whole, in exchange for hashes (compute), on an auction schedule of 140 years or whatever it is.

Each miner decides to take the network’s offer or not, by running their machines or not. Collectively, they determine how much that latest round of auctioned bitcoin is worth, in hashes and/or in energy.

Then there’s another market on top of this one which is coincidental but distinct, and that’s the market for block space, where the sellers are individual miners and the buyers are would-be transactors and of course that’s sat/vbyte.

I really do think it’s more accurate than thinking of bitcoin miners as “producing” bitcoin the way a manufacturer produces a product like cars or even discovered like gold miners discover gold. The bitcoin, all 21 million exist, just not on the ledger, from the get go. They only need to be auctioned, like treasuries. We don’t think the bidders on treasuries produce the 10-year! It’s just a weird auction mechanism where you have to prove work and your odds of winning the auction are proportional to your work / the total work by bidders.

I do get it and I think it’s right and I think it helps with a lot of misconceptions once you grok it fully. And as Dhruv says it shows you the formula for how bitcoin disrupts everything which is by making markets where there weren’t any, and building layers of distinct markets, including lighting and eventually the internet.

So, good job Dhruv.

But… it is not so easy to communicate is it? This thing is bloody hard to explain, as someone said once.

The mining analogy is useful because it's easily grokked. Also, I'm compelled to point out that all of earth's gold also already exists. Work (energy over time) is required to locate and extract it -- just like bitcoin.

Bitcoin has had two outages. They happened long time ago, but still important to remember that it can happen when we aren't careful enough.

Happily, I sidestep the issue by almost never using straws to begin with.

I’m all for biodegradable items, but I draw the line at paper straws — a bridge too far.

Replying to Avatar Sjors Provoost

Quite a few wallet fingerprints, which you can't really blame on the protocol. But it does seem that combining lots of funds in a single transaction undoes the benefits of decoys. Bad news for merchants.

Hiding among N decoys is of limited use when law enforcement is really interested in you and just checks all N of them. Chainalysis has tools to make that easier. The video doesn't explain how they filter some of the decoys.

Also Chainalysis once again admits they're collecting IP addresses without consent. And that they're running bait "RPC" nodes, though it's really insane that any wallets connect to them over clearnet (albeit sometimes with VPN). But there are very bad Bitcoin wallets too.

Dandelion and 1-shot Tor broadcast (easier) remain good ideas.

Perhaps increasing the number of decoys to hundreds would fix the issue for a while.

Fundamentally though, it's better to not leave any bread crumbs on a blockchain, or other public spaces, to begin with. Which is why I think Lightning is a better design in theory. But beware of practice. If you e.g. use a custodial wallet, they know who you're paying (until blinded paths). As a recipient things are even worse.

So I guess both Monero and Lightning still suck for merchants (charities), but might be good enough for individual customers (donors).

Also note that the goal of chain analytics isn't necessarily to collect sufficiently strong evidence for conviction. Finding a (tractable number of) suspect(s) may be enough, then they know where to look for additional evidence. Being marked as a suspect by a black box algorithm should still be serious legal issue though.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqgvra9r4sjqapufyl0vnc4kv4fz70e29em4c655y37vz206f0wt4qytkummnw3ez66tyvgaz7tmrv93ksefdwfjkccteqqs94pqute8hjxqv3kfjhwmlwu72yz6fkx72mylux6fxp5lutgj438sxglley

The real abuse of these tools comes when they are used not just to generate hypotheses for further investigation but as proof of guilt in and of themselves, as they were, for example, in the case of Roman Storm.

I figure it's important for people to see that there are also gay-friendly voices on Nostr

Haha. I’ve spent far more sats on Nostr zapping others than I’ve ever received.

You left out that the study also includes Blacks, people of lower socioeconomic status, and youth. Why do you call out bisexuals and lesbians from this list?