Avatar
SnOoZ
9a1c358f88e7693348c311986b3214386a5fa91ea4abfe706de325435c5241b5
Staying Humble. Stacking Sats.

O-fac!, was für eine sehr tolle Folge mit nostr:npub1q3y7u8crtels6ew4muephe20ae07zw80emtmvlm8zf4mg9rl63wqd5gxtn

"Wieso findet ihr gut, Transaktionen bei euch reinzunehmen, die aus klaren Betrugsmodellen entstehen?"

Bitcoin ist ein neutrales, offenes Netzwerk, ähnlich wie das Internet. Es urteilt nicht über die Art der Transaktionen.

Fungibilität bedeutet, dass jeder Bitcoin gleich wie jeder andere ist, genau wie bei Zahlen.

Die Nummer 7 ist weder gut noch böse. Sollten wir jetzt Zahlen zensurieren?

Zensur in einem offenen Netzwerk ist eine gefährliche Rutschbahn.

Zensur ist eine Top-Down-Ansicht, die im dezentralen Bitcoin-Ökosystem keinen Platz hat.

Ethischer Aktivismus hat seinen Platz, aber nicht in Mathematik oder Physik.

Stell dir vor, jemand verbietet das Multiplizieren von geraden Zahlen. Geht es deshalb weg? Nein, jemand wird einen neuen Taschenrechner erstellen, der es kann. Versuchst du, die Unausweichlichkeit der Mathematik zu zensieren?

Wenn ein Code zensiert wird, gibt es immer einen Fork, der sich dem entzieht. Warum also über Ethik debattieren, wenn die Mathematik uns zeigt, dass Zensur irrelevant ist?

Ein tief greifender Paradigmenwechsel im digitalen Zeitalter. Es ist wie die Entstehung von irrationalen Zahlen: Die Gesellschaft musste lernen sie zu verstehen und zu akzeptieren.

nostr:nevent1qqswq2hvmvgw9wqfxmvfv69ttqhl3n77pvufg0rw80ahtrt8vmmg58qpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzq8xc8zarx4tjfp6uprczapqer3gc34qfg995a6zeampjh9a74n80qvzqqqqqqyh0tsku

👏

Think in a longer term and the discussion about that will disappear.

The ordinals people have their fun now.

Good thing is that they have to pay the fee in Bitcoin and not FIAT and that pushes the BTC price up because its a use case for some. And because Bitcoin supply is limited and with rising Bitcoin price, the ordinals thing gets more and more expensive until a point when even for the ordinals peoples it gets too expensive. So it will stop. Sooner than later.

Another pro is that this paid Bitcoin Fee can get redistributed among other people as the miners have to sell them in the market to pay their business. So BTC hasca chance to move from "stupid" to "smart" people.

And its definitely economically not smart to pay for ordinals that does not give you some kind of real value back like buying food, house or a vehicle to use for your work or whatever.

Look at NFTs, they got rekked. And just because you put shit on Bitcoin, does not mean that this shit becomes something better. Its still shit. At some point the shit will get flushed down the toilet by the market.

Bitcoin will regulate the use of the block space in the most efficient way by itself in the long run.

So don't worry and

Stay Humble & Stack Sats

And I thought #Bitcoin is censorship resistant 🙎

So what's the real problem here?

Humans that want to censor others or the assumption that Bitcoin actually is not censorship resistant?

Where are all the people with "Bitcoin does not need you" or "Bitcoin does not give a shit about xyz" or "Fix the money, fix the world".

Today In see more fear instead of hope or confidence.

Stay Humble & Stack Sats

#Bitcoin fixes this!

No, please you give us all a few examples what are the super alternatives for that.

When you say its outdated, you must know how to make it better.

And I hope you know and consider every regulation and other difficulties that service provider have to face that makes them to choose that email or name way.

I don't say that its good how it is now but it does not go in my head how most internet people don't know shit as they never started or created anything but know everything better.

I think what triggered me with your post was that you provided no value. No example or smth like that. Just telling that something is outdated. lol.

People will use what they want to use and that is OK. It should be allowed to make mistakes. You learn a lot from pain.

Today, governments take away a lot of pain from people by for example saving banks with money printing. Sounds good, but they take away the ability for people to learn and being cautious longterm.

Anyway. Regulation because often people don't know the details and make assumptions and want to tell others what to do. Thats what politicians do.

In my opinion taking the easier way is not a fiat mindset. I actually think that a natural thing. E.G. water or electricity takes the easiest route to flow. Doing nothing means death, but finding the easiest way to get what you need is natural.

It doesn't matter which client someone uses. Just give them time to build their stuff and maybe improve. The market will then decide.

Is it? For everyone or just for you and maybe techies?

You did all that research?

If not let the market decide.

That's the beautiful aspect that you don't have to use it if its shit.

The environment should allow mistakes and the possibility to adapt.

Too many people expect from others to make everything right on the first shot, lol.

Where is the problem when it is not affecting the nostr protocol? It is just the client. Who is building that client can choose the rules or whatever his creativity wants. If the client is good and meets peoples needs, then it will be used.

If the client is shit, it probably will die.

Let the market play out.

"...we need to be really careful."

Why we? The client builder has to be carefull that he builds stuff that people need. Otherwise people wont use it and all his energy and money is wasted.

Your sentence sounds like a call for regulation for client builders.

Thats a FIAT mindset.

On point! 🎯