If you want a different outcome, you’ve got to do a different thing

We don’t get to choose the time we live in, only what we do with the time we have 🧡
Incredible time to be alive 🤩
Bitcoin is the longest lever we’ve ever had to effect meaningful change in the world
Grateful to be pushing on that lever with all the rest of you 🤝
nostr:note1p2ldmje09ashccmmdcyznu0hdwxxjphga54xcvx0usrx324hp0cqh0sfy6
tickle?
Bitcoin .. still early but gaining momentum
Yesterday's innovation becomes today's "legacy software stack"; early founders and projects without the hunger to continue to innovate and *deliver* material progress will rightly be obsolete
I've observed decades of this in software throughout many industry sectors across the globe .. except that for most of those industry sectors, they weren't gaining momentum, they were losing it
"Innovation" to them became rebranding, minor incremental improvement, more "regulatory compliance" (sigh), or just becoming a me-too-company by copying what emerging innovators were actually delivering
In fast-moving areas like Bitcoin, objectively re-focusing is critical, confronting, and necessary to continually deliver any new value
Huge respect for those innovating and even more so for those continuing to do so 🔥🤝

Compromising e2e comms:
- no justification
- no exceptions
Hard red line.
But they’re trying 👇
nostr:note1aj7pawy5gver8q757acq0f0xaz3g0zcp593jpcnllrvtxzqgkf2sh0h5xl
An increasingly widely used alternative for Bitcoin nodes are the reuse of microform corporate boxes with (typically) an i3/i5, and 8Gb of memory with whatever ssd storage you want to drop in
These are widely available second hand and extremely reliable workhorses that have reached their writedown eol at 3y - Dell and Lenovo would be my picks
They’re superior to Pi’s in part due to processing grunt, but predominantly because storage is not via USB and they have rock solid reliability
Ketan has a solid discussion with Stephan Livera on this last year
I have a spare one I’m happy to ship to you from Brizzy if you’d like to add that into your mix 🤝
grateful for your work building the replacement 🧡
Open source is meritocratic not democratic
.. and this is a damn good thing
https://world.hey.com/dhh/open-source-is-neither-a-community-nor-a-democracy-606abdab
Nurture #Bitcoin now and it will nurture you later
nostr:note1f96frwk4t4haymz6v9huqmnerwkk7zv0wxs0kurtwfe3ch70wmfqyzwdk2
Turns out it was snippets of an old leak that the scammer was using to direct traffic to their website where you could (wait for it) .. BUY the tools used to "do the hack"
Scammers all the way down
GM. The best is yet to come

Layer 3
Uses ⚡️ for the fast settlement layer
Cashu has unilateral exit to ⚡️
⚡️ has unilateral exit to ⛓️
Justified anger and disgust is our fuel 🔥
Hey nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg .. enjoying experimenting with Cashu 🔥
Been thinking about the idea of periodically shutting mints down to force redemption of ecash tokens .. helps mitigate a number of risks .. two thoughts:
1. Mint lifespan
By defining a mint lifespan on inception, all mint users would be aware of that lifespan, and not operate on the assumption that the lifespan is forever (Laura); clients could interrogate any mint for lifespan remaining and show it in the "Mints" section
2. User redemption fallback
Each new mint user could provide a fall-back 'location' for redemption of their ecash on closure - or possibly define that once in their eCash client? This redemption location could be on ⚡ or eCash (in its many and emerging addressability mechanisms). Clients could (automatically?) redeem all eCash tokens from an about-to expire mint to the defined fallback location
If achievable, this makes running a mint a whole lot less onerous. I've been responsible for other people's money and it is NOT in the FUN THINGS category. And the worst outcome is that you shut your mint with unredeemed sats belonging to unknown people.
Thinking further, a mint could itself have a redemption fallback.
If funds are remaining on shutdown that have not been redeemed, then they are automatically sent to a nominated place. Like the mint lifespan, this should be transparent. The mint operator chooses this but obvious candidates would be OpenSats, Brink, HRF, Bitcoin Moon Fund and other Bitcoin, Lightning, Nostr and eCash adjacent nurturing organisations.
For Cashu, if this is possible then to my mind, it makes much larger volumes of shorter lifespan mints (say 30-90 days?) viable.
Thanks for your work and all those who contribute!
Mainframes remain a backbone for financial tx processing today (>85%) because they’re cost effective for very high base load
For loads where there’s significant variance, “cloud” has gained significant foothold because it can be (not is) more cost effective
The important difference is that cloud is just someone else’s data centre over which you have zero control, AND one which incentivises centralising control and access to those hosted instances, machines and applications
Running your own servers reliably effectively and efficiently is becoming easier with tools like Proxmox .. but infrastructure remains a pita
Highly analogous to what we’re observing with ⚡️ and LSPs and the tradeoffs for efficiency, ease of use, and risk of capture
Never be ashamed of sharing the benefits of products and services you have used and support and believe in 🤝




