Avatar
mark tyler
9baed03137d214b3e833059a93eb71cf4e5c6b3225ff7cd1057595f606088434
Bitcoin & 🫂 Oh and dimly trying to think through interesting issues. I think that I don’t have a right to force you to do anything other than not harm me or others. Seems like most people I interact with in the real world disagree with this statement. To be fair.. the devil is in definition of “harm”.

Maybe you’re better than me, I tend to think I do a lot of stuff that my remembering self would not be as happy about as my living self is. I could see something like this helping me get a better balance between the remembered and lived self.

Plus, imagine if you could record and play back experiences. Like playing with a child who later passed away.

Or sharing your feelings of being hurt with your oppressor, and vice versa so you can really feel what it’s like to be each other. Would war even be conceivable in such a world?

Totally! Maybe neuralink open sources the firmware / software and people get into uploading forks

I mean i put quite a few stipulations in there haha. So under those, 100%! One reason would be to have a channel of communication that is encrypted *all the way to the brain*!!

I also would be interested, if it’s ever possible, in programming in some automations. Not exactly sure what that looks like, but maybe for example if I’m not being mindful in my communications with someone, it could ping me to remind me of my desire to be mindful.

Neuralink (if proven safe, private, and highly advantageous)?

If they are totally open to it, what reasons would motivate them? I ask knowing relatively little about the difference between orthodoxy and the others.

Or even just subtle, unique, contacts. Oh and you don’t tell anyone you’re wearing them 😅

Apple made Damus remove the zap button on posts recently :(

Which app are you on?

“[the convergence of eyes-on reports were] dark gray or black spheres inside a clear sphere” (including an observation by two military jets at about 50 feet of distance) #aliens #ufo #uap #grusch

Feel better soon 🚽🧻🧻🧻😂🫂

I think there are two things. One’s biological predispositions, and then how one sees oneself and fits into society. When they perceive a mismatch, they may change their presentation / behavior in society and also change their biology to some degree to try to close the gap. Do those changes make them in an ontological sense something they previously were not? That really depends on how we want to define what it means to make them something different. In one sense, you’re 100% right, nothing will change their DNA+. I don’t think that’s the sense that they care about though, one in which they are at least partially right (again not the people who say things like there aren’t these two things, there is only the latter thing and it isn’t affected by DNA and who seem to be mostly wrong).

Another thought here is that I think nobody should try to push a concept of themselves into someone else’s head. If I want you to think of me as nice, but you don’t.. sucks to be me. Same if I want you to think I’m right about any of this. I think part of this topic is people get to thinking they are being made to think differently than they do by the other side. “I feel I am a women, they say I mustn’t think of myself that way” “I see that person as a man, they say I must see that person as a woman”. Neither of these messages should be communicated.