Avatar
mark tyler
9baed03137d214b3e833059a93eb71cf4e5c6b3225ff7cd1057595f606088434
Bitcoin & šŸ«‚ Oh and dimly trying to think through interesting issues. I think that I don’t have a right to force you to do anything other than not harm me or others. Seems like most people I interact with in the real world disagree with this statement. To be fair.. the devil is in definition of ā€œharmā€.

šŸ˜­šŸ˜­šŸ˜­šŸ˜‚

This is all I can see now

On the strong gender divide on gun control: Why do we see this effect? I think there are multiple factors at play including that women are generally smaller, less muscular, and less aggressive than men. In the end, I think they are more likely to look to others to protect them, assuming that others can, and forgetting that ultimately this is not an outsourcable job.

Men frequently (though less frequently) think this too, but (some) people’s cultural stories create a role for man as the protector, lowering the likelihood he will adopt the flawed belief: that someone else can provide bodily protection to you.

Such a cute family. And based on the littles I can tell you guys have seen and survived some crazy times. Inspirational!

Replying to Avatar HoloKat

This may be an unpopular opinion, but I really don’t believe in the user bearing the ultimate responsibility for themselves. Not in today’s world.

I’m willing to bet 90% of you did not read the TOS of the last service you signed up for. Of course, there are some that read everything, but most probably don’t.

In the normie world that number is closer to 99.99%.

Being 100% responsible for your own actions would mean you’d have to read all the TOS and decide for yourself whether you should continue.

But we know nobody does this.

There are certain things we cannot verify for ourselves and where LAWS actually make sense. We live in a society that is held entirely by laws, not by good will or whatever imaginary thing people believe. Without laws we would not be here. We would not have a court system (no matter how dysfunctional), no enforcement of property rights without violence. Society would be hellish. Tribal warfare.

To say Worldcoin should be left up to ā€œfree marketsā€ is total bullshit. Yes, I agree, it would be NICE if people did the right thing for themselves. But we’d be lying to ourselves if we didn’t acknowledge that NOBODY read their TOS when they scanned their eyeballs. And even if they did, they would probably not understand the implications of this action.

Hence, we turn to laws. We already have consumer protection laws that actually work and do protect us from certain things. Lead in the water, horrific death from negligence. Fire retardants, safety codes, seatbelts, all the things we take advantage of without actively thinking about took some terrible events to make into law. Look up how and why seat belts become law in US if you don’t believe me.

Besides, even if every one of us were perfectly capable of making a fully autonomous decision, there will always be groups of people who aren’t - elderly, young, disabled, divergent, whatever the proper terms are today…

Worldcoin is taking advantage of the developing world first for a reason. The lure of money is tempting when its tough getting by as it is.

Besides, your free markets aren’t all that free anyway. When the system upon which ā€œFree marketsā€ are based on is itself corrupted, the market isn’t really free. Just look at the Robinhood fiasco. So much for free markets there.

We could argue about the last points for hours, because people will say, yeah but you had a choice! Well, yes and no.

Point being - ā€œfree marketsā€ are not an excuse to ignore the realities of the world and the necessary constraints society puts in place for all of us to function. Let’s not delude ourselves into thinking free markets are the answer to everything. They are not.

Thinking about this still. I believe you may be assuming that the concept of a state-created law and the concept of a group that has an approval-bestowing role must always come together.

The benefit of mixing them is that there is less work for the consumer. But that doesn’t mean that a solution where we have the latter without the former wouldn’t work out well for everyone. And the cost of course is a significant reduction in freedom.

To make that more concrete: I agree, the goal of having everyone read every line in a ToS will never happen because humans are.. too limited. But if people can find groups that do it for them that they deem to be aligned with them, and they see the group’s stamp of approval on the ToS, they can make a more than completely uninformed decision on whether to sign.

1 hour: I better buy some BTC, but coins are so expensive

2 hours: i better buy some ETH to.. and also some HEX and XLM and ….

100 hours: there is no second best

Small note, miners do not decide whether a transaction is legitimate, they can only decide whether a transaction is illegitimate. They do this by not including it. This is a somewhat weak mechanism, limited by the degree of decentralization of mining.

Conversely, if they try to decide that a transaction is legitimate (that doesn’t follow historical rules) then everyone’s nodes will ignore it. This ultimately falls back to a social layer, but there is a strong bias toward not changing anything since everyone needs to physically update their nodes to work with the now-forked chain.

Nice, scanned both of them for good measure

The app does have to be internet connected though, I don’t know exactly when the OS will wake it.

And are you just trying to post one to there? Or receive business payments? I don’t think Phoenix can do LNURL because it’s only on when it’s on

How many transactions have you done? Phoenix helps manage your channels, if you click the ā€œ?ā€ does it explain what that fee is for / how much of it is just setting you up with a channel?

nostr:note10p9tadyyzgrnr2ly8lc8d4nank3rrf69kefa2x4qzdfuzvj6s4ns7xh3zf

Lol. True. I guess with WLD you have a proof of personhood that goes stale.. well immediately. Any time you’re not physically looking into the orb to ā€œsignā€ it’s stale.

Proof of personhood is nice… but there’s no way to make it decentralized :(

Can the phone always have Phoenix up? Or always when people are checking out?

Yes… thought, as far as I know, it needs to be running in order to help coordinate receiving the funds. It’s an LN thing, which is why you see people outsourcing that job with custodial apps (as in wallet or satoshi, which has a nice point of sale feature).

You might just want to run your own BTCpay server, leaving aside iOS, to do jt

Have you looked at Phoenix?