I’d say that would mostly work for simple questions: should I eat donuts all day every day to stay fit. What about complicated questions? Does the covid vaccine provide net benefit? How can someone even observe something like this when the don’t have their own random control group? And what do we do with the high likelihood that they are unfamiliar with statistics?

What exactly do you mean here?

It sounds like you don’t trust them because of not their expertise, but rather because of their profit incentive? If not by trusting experts, how do you do compensate for the people’s tendency to come to wildly wrong opinions?

Big if true. Unfortunately, not true.

If Damus videos have been a bother to you, try this! Thanks nostr:npub1wtuh24gpuxjyvnmjwlvxzg8k0elhasagfmmgz0x8vp4ltcy8ples54e7js nostr:note1g92shh60zrp6lrlun97v0xzp0yvzalqs4j8tlaaeave8kn9wuuqsf3n3n4

Wildly misunderstood

Is there a way to open the linked media in a note in our phone browser?

In-damus video controls are currently missing, so watching longer videos with the ability to pause or skip forward/backward doesn’t work. Maybe an iOS shortcut could do this easily?

Re: it’s not about the gun, it’s about the person holding it nostr:note1ee3z29e403n99wf967q4apn2k4tchkgnylrk5uwwscqmfd2yhyqsmkgx3z

I disagree with the following statement, just thinking through what I think they would say “it’s about every tool people are using that causes a disproportionate amount of pain and suffering compared the utility it provides and the difficulty of enforcing a rule around that tool. Rocks cause a very small amount of suffering, have a huge amount of utility, and are impossible to regulate. Guns cause a large amount of suffering, have limited utility, and are relatively easy to regulate”

Open street maps*

Yes but is there a specific they and a specific lie you’re referring to? I’m wondering what they are lying about and how we know they know they are lying.

🫡

How would you compare this to posting links

😂

How to square this with the ideals of contract law though

I thought they have more than they would in Russia? We probably only need one individual to correctly expect less religious or otherwise freedom.

You can’t defend something you don’t already own, and I don’t think we could claim that the Russian soldiers own any of the land they’ve taken in this conflict.

How does the maximum multiplier you are willing to tack on to your required lifetime labor in order to build a fully free society, where above that multiplier you say “ok, now we build a state apparatus to force everyone to get in line”, and how does that maximum tolerable multiplier compare with what is actually needed” (keeping in mind what is needed may well be < 1)

Especially because human capability for consumption is infinite - no matter how fast our productivity grows, we will want more.

Nice. So like you’re saying, as long as you personally are willing to store the other files you can definitely roll together as many as you want. Just hash the whole lot of them together and submit the hash.

Frees up onchain space but takes on-your-hard-drive space

This makes the scale limit not the onchain fees, but rather how many people want to go in with you and Joe many files you want to store indefinitely for each proof stamp you need.

Define publish. You can use bitcoin onchain to prove you had a given file at a certain time.