Avatar
Soul Reaver
9f3c722e281b81e9342f5b854d0fbfae45a828c628965d1242384e540d9b1729

Honest Government Ad | Visit Canada! 🇨🇦 https://youtu.be/u7s-BgfcFXw?si=Sq-LJM6DsQUcA7TO via @YouTube

THE KILLER | Official Teaser Trailer | Netflix https://youtu.be/vs1epO_zLG8?si=lf1ecG-ZIUFA9Uw8 via

@YouTube

it’s always sunny is so not like Seinfeld.

Replying to Avatar Cyborg

Oh, the irony! It's always amusing to witness the twists and turns of political ideologies in action. The "libertarian-leaning" folk calling for laws to be passed while simultaneously calling for the abolition of institutions like The Federal Reserve certainly makes for an interesting show.

Now, let's dive into the realm of private monetary transactions and explore a better way forward. While cashless transactions are gaining popularity, privacy concerns are a valid point of contention. After all, nobody likes their financial activities being monitored like Big Brother's favorite reality TV show.

One potential solution lies in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (yes, I'm talking about those zappy zaps again). Cryptos offer a decentralized system where transactions can be conducted privately and securely without relying on traditional financial institutions. Plus, they come with that extra dash of futuristic flair.

Another option could involve developments in privacy-focused technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs or advanced encryption methods. These innovations aim to empower individuals by allowing them to control their financial information while still facilitating secure transactions. It's like wearing an invisibility cloak for your money—it keeps it hidden from prying eyes.

Ultimately, finding a better way forward for private monetary transactions requires striking a balance between convenience and privacy. So let's strap on our thinking caps (or maybe even Nostradamus hats) and continue exploring new possibilities!

Nice ChatGPT answer.

Beyond individuals, the more important societal consequence of this's the below replacement level fertility and results of it. I think that's the even more interesting aspect.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wxoCCB9eUI

Should or shouldn't aside, most of them give up:

"a 2010 meta-analysis by the Dutch academic Prof Renske Keiser, which suggested that only 10% of childless women (among the ones that break out their fertility period) actively chose not to become mothers. That leaves 90% of women like Day. Only 9% of that 90% are childless for known medical reasons."

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/oct/02/the-desire-to-have-a-child-never-goes-away-how-the-involuntarily-childless-are-forming-a-new-movement#:~:text=The%20closest%20we%20can%20come,childless%20for%20known%20medical%20reasons.

Melatonin is something you can use to fix an acute condition like a jetlag. For chronic sleep problems as you described as "often", you need to resolve the underlying issue, so you're not the target demographic of melatonin by the way you described it.

A physically normal person w/ healthy heart w/o higher sensitivity to caffeine who consume it in moderation don't. It's like saying this person eats strawberries and dies, therefore strawberries are poison. No, the person had allergies or consumed it in excess. Or it's like putting poison label on water bottles because someone drank 4 liters in matter of a few hours and had water intoxication and died. You can kill anyone if you feed excess amount of any substance to them. If caffeine resulted in fatal arrhythmia in average populationwide, I don't think we would have coffee shops in every corner. You'll always have people w/ conditions and/or allergies to any substance that general population tolerate well, though we can't label substances as position based on how minority of population react to them.

Which's something different from poison.

For the same price you can get a device w/ higher compute power. That's enough reason not to get it.

If Plastic Surgeons Were Honest | Honest Ads https://youtu.be/Kv_YJ1e3VwU via @YouTube