Avatar
JS-NodeRunner
a3ca30d4e3566fc632377f13cf96564d523b35d5c9e46d2232e8cab0021917ea

Great video. However a slight correction is needed... Ocean doesn't "require" hashers to build their own templates... you can mine to the pool without Datum. You choose from one of Ocean's (ocean.xyz/docs/templates…).

You're not making your own template unless you use Datum.

I will only pay with Bitcoin if it is PRICED IN BITCOIN.

Practice what you preach! Have some conviction. Put your money where your mouth is.

I dare you to explain your reasons for not pricing in Bitcoin without sounding like a fiat pussy.

I want to take a moment and salute everyone who has spoken up and taken a stand in calling out Core's authoritarianism and disregard for node-running plebs. This year has been a very enlightening time in finding out who is a serious Bitcoiner and who is a "crypto-asset"-NGU'er. (I'm not talking about people that are new to Bitcoin and still learning what a node or hardware wallet is).

Speaking up and "choosing a side" is not easy... it's much easier to keep your head down and believe that things will sort themselves out. I don't think I'd be the first person to compare this to covid vaccine mandates. It seems easy now to see the failure of "the experts" and runaway authoritarianism. But at the time, it was not easy at all. (NC State was one step away from mandating it for employees... they were already terminating anyone unvaccinated that was part of Federally funded programs).

What I really want to address here is those that say, "See, it worked out okay in the end. See, there were no vaccine passports. See, the mandates have been lifted." Yes but only because there were enough people who said, "Awwwww hell no!" Another analogous incident was only a couple months ago when the US bombed Iran. It was very interesting to see who made excuses for it and who were freaking out. Only by some miracle it didn't escalate into WW3. And yet there were people saying, "See, it worked out fine. See, calm down."

It's possible that this year's OP_RETURN/filter debate turns out not to be the end of Bitcoin as we know it... (I still have my doubts). But man, hats off to everyone that is, and continues to raise hell about it. Bitcoin is not just an "anti-fragile" honey-badger, unstoppable-train all on its own. It takes people to make it that way.

Well shit, me too.... Just ordered.

I don't usually like the mesh/trucker style, but this summer heat is brutal.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

How is "always has been" an argument to make it even more spam friendly?

Replying to Avatar vnprc

It's a hard line in the sand that is technically irrelevant. Inscriptions already opened the floodgates of spam. I think team Knots is making a strategic error in fighting the last war. But they are masters of their own fate and I don't believe they will back down from this line in the sand.

They are, however, the only team in the fucking world that is making a difference where it matters most. More and different block template producers is "what really matters". Ocean is smartly positioned to apply filters at the block template producer's mempool. The only filters that could possibly matter are the filters in front of block template producers.

Core, on the other hand, is fighting a battle of self-determination. They have wanted to change OP_RETURN policy for years. In the past they backed down from this fight. Some core devs are pushing the issue because they want to be masters of their own fate. I would do the same in their position.

I don't take a side in this fight because 1) it's a stupid fight and 2) despite my technical opinions, I don't believe the core organization should have the level of status that people ascribe to it. They diminish their own esteem by engaging in this fight and I don't believe that's a bad thing.

Core devs, some by their own admission, are solving interesting technical problems. But they don't appear to be addressing the most critical challenges to the bitcoin movement.

This is not a criticism directed at core. Core is just a software project. The bitcoin community makes an error in assuming that bitcoin core stands at the highest echelon of leadership. We shouldn't be expecting core to solve all of our problems. We need to solve our own problems.

What happens when an immovable object meets an unstoppable force? So far it seems that what happens is everyone gets so engrossed in the spectacle they lose their sense of perspective. Shouting at the other side because you don't like them is net negative. Keep your eyes on the prize: freedom tech is what matters.

I agree with most everything you say, but I am baffled by these two statements...

>"They are, however, the only team in the fucking world that is making a difference where it matters most."

>"I don't take a side in this fight because 1) it's a stupid fight"

Huh? Take a side for the team that is making a difference! The decision to not take a side is sad and weak. Here's an analogy (probably not a good one, just came up with off the top of my head)...

You: "Well the climate change activists make some good points, but I see their flaws too, and scientists are divided on the topic, so I'm not going to take a side. Just let Bill Gates block the sun with clouds, it probably won't work anyway. It's a stupid fight to get involved in. The WEF are just exposing themselves, and I'm glad to see it. I'll just be quiet and mind my own business."

This is an obvious strawman of your position, but it's the only way I can think of to say, pick a side! Further the cause that matters.

Existential issues going on in bitcoin, and influencers like this are posting about trees, birds, butterflies, the moon... anything except, lol.

No boosts for Knots, or Ocean, or Mechanic, or Luke. The silence helps you see how serious they are. Or as one my favorite things Walker used to say... "Hey, how about the game last night."

I thought they have at least that many users currently. Is there something you found that disqualifies Keet?