I try to curate a small group of people and stick with them.
I don’t like the idea of an LLM hijacking my mind, as it will ultimately serve the company’s interests, not my pursuit of truth.
Humans do the same,
but I believe LLMs have raised the bar.
The Shibuya Scramble Crossing in Tokyo, Japan, accommodates up to 3,000 pedestrians at once, with their synchronized movements forming a captivating display of urban flow.
[📹 Masaki Hani]
https://video.nostr.build/96e76d3470ac49f90f8c14a90f1e75b6cfacfe4c7c395178d7d65fc47522488d.mp4
We are the bloodstream.
I will play devil’s advocate.
The most deluded people in the future will be Jesus followers, clinging to the promise of a better future in paradise.
There are lessons to extrapolate—living in the present is truly important—but there is too much rhetoric in their words.
I feel that Nietzsche’s Will to Power is an essential component of life.
Nothing new under the sun.

The smartest will always rise above the masses.
You can't change that, not even with Bitcoin.
You can only create space for a new aristocracy to lead society with new ideas.
Marcus Aurelius, a wise man, left the empire to his degenerate son, marking the beginning of its decline.
Westerners are deluded by a notion of freedom that exists only in their fogged minds.
None of them ever escaped the Matrix; that was the message that recurred many times.
The people lobbying are focused on promoting their own platforms—this is politics. Michael, on the other hand, is simply trying to educate them about Bitcoin, a powerful tool. However, in reality, things aren’t strictly black and white; there are nuances and complexities.
Edward Gibbon and Will Durant are highly recommended authors for gaining historical context.
Indeed, most people will still gladly choose to be slaves.
I’m studying Computer Science and have a deep passion for Bitcoin.
I’m eager to deepen my understanding of its vast and fragmented technical landscape and looking for mentors to help me learn how to contribute meaningfully.
No, my comment is just speculation on what seems to be their approach to Bitcoin. It would make sense to use it to gain a political advantage. Many of Trump's team hold Bitcoin, and many emerging right-wing populists are also enthusiastic about Bitcoin.
Would it make sense for a political party to favor an emerging form of money held by its international allies in order to entrench its position for decades?
Historically, "freedom" has always been a word used to manipulate and control.
It could protect the dollar's hegemony while preserving the freedom of exchange through Bitcoin and potentially offer a solution to the debt problem.
Given his Bitcoin treasury, a stable dollar backed by Bitcoin would make a lot of sense.
We, as a people, decide what has value and exchange this value among ourselves for goods and services.
We have chosen to disconnect them from us, not the other way around.
We shield our wealth in cyberspace; we are not imprisoned by it.
Satoshi laid the bricks for our bastions.









