any lightning devs use nostr?
still no one has answered my lightning question š„
can someone explain simply all the possible ways that managing your lightning channel could result in you losing a portion of the Bitcoin that you have locked up in that channel?
- i heard forced closures can be expensive, and especially in high fee environments?
- i heard that if your node is offline that someone can force close, and then present an outdated channel state that benefits them?
- if you mismanage your liquidity (maybe make your channel too small) then you can essentially lock up that Bitcoin because itās not worth paying the fee to even close the channel?
- anything else?
and what would be all the different methods / best practices for protecting against any of these potential loss of funds?
ahhhh i always thought of bluewallet as custodial (maybe because it defaults to custodial lightning), so i never actually considered it a viable privacy option - sounds like i need to revisit that tho
iām just trying to take a lot of privacy focused steps with my setup - and i just want to make sure that the app would never accidentally connect to the public node (instead of your own node that you configured), and then it sort of āleaksā what addresses youāre wallet is watching
maybe i have that all wrong, but thatās why i liked zeus because it just doesnāt work if it doesnāt find a connection to your own node (which i like)
but yeah, sounds like i need to do a bit of research around running blue wallet in a sovereign manner š¤
iāve heard some mixed opinions about wasabiās mixing process, but iām unsure if thereās any substance to those claims - if i was to step outside of whirlpool iād probably try JAM (joinmarket) because that seems pretty gooooood
i think thereās a bit of a question mark next to wasabi and JAM around mixing constantly into the exact same liquidity (where as thatās less / not possible in whirlpool)
again, iām no expert so i could be wrong in every single thing iāve said there
but good to know itās just a slow process and my node / sparrow isnāt broken or something! šš¼
makes sense - iāve been assured that even after one mix your privacy is like significantly improved anyway, and adding extra remixes doesnāt necessarily help your privacy all that much š¤
if i ran my own node and had my corn stashed in cold storage, how could i check the balance of my hardware wallet whenever i wanted from my iphone, through my own node?
zeus is a great option for lightning on iphone (all through your own node using tor), but is there an iphone equivalent for on-chain watch-only wallets?
when setting up your own bitcoin lightning node / channels, can someone explain the different ways you could lose some / all of your bitcoin that you lock up in channels?
- forced closures (iāve heard are particularly bad during high fee environments)
- not backing up channel state and node on the other side of the channel uses previous state of channel (i think watchtowers are meant to prevent this)
anything else? and how do you best prevent / protect against these risks?
bump
nostr:note1jx8v9cschrlf8mc70yzkyumztlmphe4gu6ngl8zc3mz996cwdafqc6l0hw
bump
nostr:note1jx8v9cschrlf8mc70yzkyumztlmphe4gu6ngl8zc3mz996cwdafqc6l0hw
another question on lightning channels -
what are the different ways i can fuck it up and lose my money? especially in a high-fee environment too?
i remember hearing stories of people getting force closed in a high-fee environment and losing a fair bit more than they expected
also, thereās the whole watchtower system which sounds like itās important to not get stitched up by other people, but i know nothing about that
anything else iām missing too?
thanks for that info, multiple channels makes sense that it improves privacy, not just always going through the same route, couple questions tho:
- how do i know what nodes to establish channels with from the beginning?
- like do i want to just jump in with a really big well connected node, or is it more optimal to go for someone not as big?
- is there any restriction on what nodes you must have channels with to use the loop service?
- iām using CLN, so i think i have to use the ānloopā plugin, does this create any problems for me?
okay, so i spent awhile trying to wrap my head around lightning liquidity, and i need someone to check if iām correct here:
if i wanted to purchase ~$100 p/week in non-KYC BTC over the lightning network (using Robosats), and then maybe when the balance hits like ~$1500 iād probably want to move these funds on-chain, mix them, then send to cold storage
now, to do this i think i need to establish a channel with a well connected node and that channel would need about $1500 of inbound liquidity (and iād probably want to keep maybe $500 in outbound liquidity too, just in case i wanted to spend on lightning more generally)
then, as i buy non-KYC BTC iāll have that liquidity move from inbound to outbound, to the point where after 15-weeks iāll have no inbound and entirely outbound liquidity in this lightning channel
what then? i would want to rebalance this channel, so iād have to use an option like āloopā or āboltzā, where i would send all my outbound liquidity back over the channel, this would switch my $1500 of outbound liquidity to $1500 of inbound liquidity, right?
and then, with these āloopā and āboltzā services they would then send me the equivalent of $1500 on chain BTC to compensate me for moving all my outbound liquidity over (taking some 1% fee or whatever in the process)
then i just rinse and repeat the process?
seems like when they add āsplicingā (resizing channels) it would be a bit simpler
i.e. when all the inbound becomes outbound then i can just create a movement for all the outbound to move on chain, and at the same time i can throw some more liquidity into the outbound to refresh it
Yes theyāve solved liquidity but the coinjoin will be 8/9/10 paths.
Currently paying about 50-60k Sats per whack to get things in next block but you can dial down fee rates if youāre happy to do things slower.
Ben nostr:npub1rxysxnjkhrmqd3ey73dp9n5y5yvyzcs64acc9g0k2epcpwwyya4spvhnp8 has a good tutorial if you want to know more https://youtu.be/FbyjG2upGO8
yeah, i just watched that entire video, it looks a little more complicated than sparrow / whirlpool, nice UI, but itās not as simple as like pay one fee and wait - sort of seems like you have to keep making transactions, and keep paying that fee
i think i just need to become a bit more comfortable with the fee structure and iāll be all good though
when he looks at the outputs itās interesting how they arenāt all the same value, thereās a mix of matching values
i did a quick search on samourai twitter to see what they mention about joinmarket (because they usually donāt beat around the bush when it comes to criticising shit)
they seem to place it below whirlpool but above samaurai, almost feels like their opinion might be āif youāre not going to whirlpool, probably should use joinmarketā
i think the only concern my simple brain could make sense of was that joinmarket reuses liquidity, so i think whirlpool is waiting for fresh liquidity to remix, but joinmarket you could technically be mixing with the same handful people over and over, so itās not seen really as a gain to the anonymity set
could be completely wrong there tho, that was just what i could gather from a quick look, iāll keep looking
Any trade-offs in terms of privacy here? Iām just about to do a bit of my own research, but I always thought of Whirlpool as āgold standardā in terms of its privacy - but yeah, feels like maybe the liquidity isnāt there (in the pool Iām in at least)?
How has Join Market solved the liquidity issue? It seems newer so I wouldnāt expect more people using it?
Yep, similar experience as above. Iāve had it sitting there trying to remix for like the better part of a week and the most mixes a UTXO has is two (2).
Iām guessing itās a liquidity problem?
I know you get decent privacy gains just after a single mix, but I was I do feel like a 10+ would feel a lot better, at this rate I wouldnāt even have 10 mixes after like two months š¤Ø
JAM? is that joinmarket?
bump
nostr:note1p2kzf6fzdgegdsrqgps864uz8z2q4632skhw7cs8huxcwg3hjeqsg2ht4x
any reason why whirlpool with sparrow is slow to remix? iāve had it running for the better part of 5-days and it has only mixed utxoās at best twice š¤ did i not pay a high enough fee at the beginning, or is this just the speed of the process?
whatās the air like in nyc right now yaāll? can you still go outside and do stuff?