Not your rack, not your hash.
If you dont control the hardware you dont control where it mines and all hosted mining is white market.
The adversary is the threats from the state.
white market is anyone who abides by government regulations
black market are those who ignore or subvert it
White market mining is and always will be a security risk.
lets says 51% of hash is institutional mining in the US. A law is passed that any miner in the US must enforce OFAC censorship.
That 51% is now doing the opposite of securing the network.
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Jurisdictional-Arbitrage-Fallacy
And it doesnt matter where you take your hashrate if 51% is enforcing censorship.
If you are in the US do you think giant mining farms are going to relocate or even be allowed to take their equipment out of the US to subvert US sanctions? Pools dont matter they are all centralized and trusted.
Much better to educate people about the actual security model and risks of white market mining.
Building out substantial hash defense beforehand makes things a lot easier instead of waiting to respond to an active 51% attack
#bitcoin cannot be both permissioned and permissionless at the same time
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Permissionless-Principle
Put your words where your money is
Open source miners unite in the solution
nostr:note1dxym6jrfsphjmhchggayneafu940zpq34aygg6xnqjgqqv95sdaslpxtws
Not your rack, not your hash.
If you dont control the hardware you dont control where it mines and all hosted mining is white market.
The adversary is the threats from the state.
white market is anyone who abides by government regulations
black market are those who ignore or subvert it
White market mining is and always will be a security risk.
lets says 51% of hash is institutional mining in the US. A law is passed that any miner in the US must enforce OFAC censorship.
That 51% is now doing the opposite of securing the network.
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Jurisdictional-Arbitrage-Fallacy
And it doesnt matter where you take your hashrate if 51% is enforcing censorship.
If you are in the US do you think giant mining farms are going to relocate or even be allowed to take their equipment out of the US to subvert US sanctions? Pools dont matter they are all centralized and trusted.
Much better to educate people about the actual security model and risks of white market mining.
Building out substantial hash defense beforehand makes things a lot easier instead of waiting to respond to an active 51% attack
#bitcoin cannot be both permissioned and permissionless at the same time
https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Permissionless-Principle
Beasts are hashing
Nerdqaxe+ 4xBM1368 
NerdQaxe+ ~4 days an average of ~5TH/s out of two miners running at ~53.5wats each solo lottery mining.
Chance per block: 1 in 136,209,434
Chance per day: 1 in 945,899
Hmm. Better post that in zues github issue maybe a bug
2 x NerdQaxe+
so far after runing it for 72hr we can see that the range for both low of 3.8 - 6.5 TH/s not bad for ~55W each miner. an average of 5TH/S
mining to my own solo pool with my own node Thanks to nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshszxrhwden5te0dehhxarj9enx6apwwa5h5tnzd9az7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xwtcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wdmksetjv5hxxmmd9uqzquks6t3s3a46a7z529lr0t447w2u8a0pckl8re3kkxtf02k5t934cxm62h
no one can stop an individual from mining in 2025.
lottery odds better than casino and any state lottery
no more excuses not to run a Bitaxe 
2 x NerdQaxe+
so far after runing it for 72hr we can see that the range for both low of 3.8 - 6.5 TH/s not bad for ~55W each miner. an average of 5TH/S
mining to my own solo pool with my own node Thanks to nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshszxrhwden5te0dehhxarj9enx6apwwa5h5tnzd9az7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xwtcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wdmksetjv5hxxmmd9uqzquks6t3s3a46a7z529lr0t447w2u8a0pckl8re3kkxtf02k5t934cxm62h
no one can stop an individual from mining in 2025.
lottery odds better than casino and any state lottery
no more excuses not to run a Bitaxe
So I was suprised to see that when I attempted to consolidate a few utxos on chain with nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9ekxzmnyqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueq555fk2 that when I selected both utxos and chose spend full amount that it would only send one utxo to the receive address not both.
I was able to send the left behind utxo to the new address and it listed both utxo as separate in that new address.
I was only able to consolidate by sweeping the entire wallet, which was fine but I guess I don't understand why when selecting two utxos it wouldn't send both to new address as a new single utxo.
You must have not put combined amount of both utxos and spent less than total amount.
NerdQaxe+ solo hashing
So far stable and hashing as designed
Chance per block: 1 in 164,315,094
Chance per day: 1 in 1,141,077 
after 2hr or runningnostr:npub1vwf2mytkyk22x2gcmr9d7ktprakh6llwpzxqlke8rlv5j0qyx2esf2lxtw 3Th/s I saw your unboxing
Hash pointed at my own solo pool using nostr:npub1wtgd9ccg76awlp29zl3h466l89wr7hsut0n3ucmtr95h4t29jc6srlsxp2 on nostr:npub126ntw5mnermmj0znhjhgdk8lh2af72sm8qfzq48umdlnhaj9kuns3le9ll NerQaxe+ from @bitronicsStore
2xNerdQaxe+
Solo hashing to my own pool 
