Shells didn’t fail, Gold was discovered.

Gold didn’t fail, fiat was purposely designed to capture the energy embedded into it.

Fiat didn’t fail, bitcoin was discovered.

dafuq

I‘m looking at it from an AGI side, regarding how consciousness works and what the common logic is, to reverse engineer consciousness.

That are my personal standards for public figures.

cool

nostr:note1p8r35ad5730tpv8nuyktepukskck0xkt4r0z0s62evg45argpslqnq7j2l

AI giving me a little pick-me-up

It only needs to pretend to represent them

"Doesn’t it follow that a ship’s captain or ruler won’t seek and order what is advantageous to himself, but what is advantageous to a sailor? No one in any position of rule, insofar as he is a ruler, seeks or orders what is advantageous to himself, but what is advantageous to his subjects; the ones of whom he is himself the craftsman. It is to his subjects and what is advantageous and proper to them that he looks, and everything he says and does he says and does for them."

Trump losing would have radicalized a sizeable contingent of his supporters. Instead, they are now a bunch of simping statist bootlickers.

It’s so interesting to witness what people “value” around here. Only certain content gets the most sats. There are a few exceptions but it’s obvious the content that’s the most popular. Cool. Like what you like. Zap what you want. But then don’t complain about diversity of content and people leaving. What’s the incentive to stay?

And before someone says “post good content”, people do. I’m observant. I’m not seeing the “value4value” model working for a variety of content. If I’m wrong, someone prove me wrong. I want to be proven wrong. So post the proof.

There really is no big difference between adults and kids. No matter how old, you still get happy when someone you like holds your hand. You still want to feel loved. You are still hungry and angry, happy and sad sometimes.

Authorities will always assume they have authority, even when they don't. That authority is ONLY applicable to specifics subject matter over specific jurisdictions. To defend ourselves against these paper tyrants we need to understand who we are and where we stand, this who has, or doesn't have, jurisdiction over us and the subject matter at hand.

Public entities created through public paper operating on public hardware using public are already known counterparties to every engagement. While, private parties created through private paper contracts that contract with their private peers only through private portals on private hardware can stay in the private domain.

It's essential that one sees both sides of this coin in order to ride the third side, the edge between them both.

If you seriously believe that its possible to use any digital device anonymously in the face of the US Government you have clearly not been paying attention for the past 15 years.

lol