Lol, that's what happens when you mess with energy companies
Most "sugars" are just different types of alcohols that get converted by the liver to aldehydes and then to carboxylic acids, both components being carcinogens
I don't want to sound negative but maybe you're too stick ok the idea of paywalls.
Another thing. The primary value you get from V4V is by changing people for the better
If you don't take that as your base, You won't have any success to begin with.
Sounds tricky but I needed to say it
It doesn't matter if no one cared about you in the first place
The baby is like: "let me out, toxic maximalist"
Ngmi 😂
If it succeeds, it could become an easy way to onboard certain users that see #grownostr to learn or be part of certain initiatives/ventures
The core attack vector is pointed towards diminishing the sense responsibility and giving power to the state
¿Se podría decir lo mismo de la prueba de trabajo (en el sentido de timechain)?
La prueba de trabajo que tiene bitcoin a veces tiene algo llamado los chainsplits donde 2 participantes pueden ser considerados los ganadores de un bloque y la única manera de resolver estos cortes es a través de un proceso más o menos democrático.
¿Es la prueba de trabajo entonces adecuada o tiene cierta dependencia en el algoritmo?
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about what vibe to embrace as we head to $100k and beyond.
The clown world headlines. The Stockholm Syndrome. The sociopathic parasites. It’s too much already and it’ll only increase.
I’m done responding to and getting outraged over every weak communist who thinks they have a unique insight as to why Bitcoin “won’t work” or should be “banned”. (It’s part of why I like Nostr so much, we just have fun here in our enclave because we know we already won. Twitter is outrage.)
Because it’s not my or your job to convince anyone.
The. Price. Speaks. For. Itself.
So I’m just going to laugh at all the seething and cope from all the would be petty tyrants, hopefully to their faces.
“Did I hurt its little feelings?” https://video.nostr.build/b4979b7c1965107078ec1729789a5739d70762ef27fe598734b3c0bdd6664f16.mp4
It's not about the money...
'''
Alas, all these risks have materialised.
- Today, Bitcoin transactions are still inconvenient, slow, and costly. Outside the darknet, the hidden part of the internet used for criminal activities, it is hardly used for payments at all. The regulatory initiatives to combat the large-scale use of the Bitcoin network by criminals have not been successful yet. Even the full sponsoring by the government in El Salvador which granted it legal tender status and tried hard to kick off network effects through an initial Bitcoin gift of $30 in free bitcoin to citizens could not establish it as successful means of payment.
- Likewise, Bitcoin is still not suitable as an investment. It does not generate any cash flow (unlike real estate) or dividends (stocks), cannot be used productively (commodities), and offers no social benefit (gold jewellery) or subjective appreciation based on outstanding abilities (works of art). Less financially knowledgeable retail investors are attracted by the fear of missing out, leading them to potentially lose their money.
- And the mining of Bitcoin using the proof of work mechanism continues to pollute the environment on the same scale as entire countries, with higher Bitcoin prices implying higher energy consumption as higher costs can be covered by miners.
'''
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/date/2024/html/ecb.blog20240222~0929f86e23.en.html
Such overmoroning ... Yuck
Yeah, energy is confusing. I'm talking about a loose idea, don't take me too seriously.
I just see the connection between trust being a low probability phenomenon and energy being able to achieve improbable states, things that some people could call miracles. I'm not saying how that could be achieved in real life
Genuine connections need trust. Trust is a statistical and informatic phenomenon.
Getting trustworthy connections is highly improbable if you don't know the person you are trying to trust. My proposal to circumvent this is to try to scale the energy society can use. Energy can make you able to achieve low-probability high-order events, to swim against entropy. It could make the search for trust feasible in the future.
Quieres esto decir que las versiones sin (por ejemplo) taproot son inseguras y que la idea de compatibilidad hacia atrás es complicada de ejecutar?
In the beginning, I sought for the most logical people I could know of. Today, I search for people that cause me curiosity. Little list of follows but a LOT of content and ideas
I'm planning to use AI to ignore fiat distractions 100% of the time and focus on the signal, like npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe says. Sometimes it can be irritating