Avatar
Lockesmith
ac16282f720514d926a57b5c13f02d1f4e32bd6fe3e00f713f50964571685f62

Gm #Plebs, rise and grind! If you don't chase your goals, someone else will. Wake up and take that shit!

#plebchain #coffeechain #gm #riseandgrind

Outside of fully autonomous systems like Bitcoin though, there is always (I can't think of a situation that there's not) a human to accompany the software in the case of such a malfunction. In which case we're back to human is mildly inconvenienced and if he fucks up, everyone dies.

I need a tool to make sure all my data is synced to my own relay. Is that something I should entrust in a client? Do I need to go scour for a solution?

#nostr #grownostr #relay #asknostr #plebchain

I've always hated the term. Engineering implies that if you fuck up, people will die. If developers fuck up, people may get mildly inconvenienced.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

The False Dichotomy: Soft Forks vs. Innovation

----------------------------------------------

A common argument in the altcoin community is that Bitcoin isn't innovating, especially compared to newer, "advanced" altcoins. I've debunked this fiat argument in the past, as it equates bribed rent-seekers with entrepreneurs under the label of "developers." These arguments come from non-technical midwits that spew altcoin propaganda and have no interest in providing value.

Unfortunately, this argument has a particularly obnoxious form within Bitcoin where the so-called "moderates" argue that Bitcoin needs to implement more soft forks to continue innovating or progressing or gaining adoption. This argument is flawed for several reasons.

First, it's incorrect to say Bitcoin isn't innovating. Numerous developers are continually working on Bitcoin, not just in Core, but in the many projects building on top of it. Innovation doesn't just mean changes at the protocol level; it also happens in second layers. Innovation is happening in a permissionlessly.

Second, equating soft forks with innovation is not understanding the long-term consequences. Soft forks are permanent changes to the protocol, and implementing them doesn't necessarily make Bitcoin more innovative or better. In fact, rushing to add new features can introduce security vulnerabilities, a problem often seen in many altcoins. Worse, if the soft fork is a complete dud, we're stuck with it. Reversing a soft fork requires a hard fork. We're essentially stuck with these soft-fork changes forever so we'd better be careful about the changes we let in.

Third, there's a misconception that a lack of soft forks indicates stagnation. This view ignores Bitcoin's biggest strength: its decentralization. Because Bitcoin is not controlled by a single entity, it doesn't have a traditional roadmap or deadlines. This decentralization enables a more organic and safer form of innovation, primarily occurring in layers above the Bitcoin protocol.

Innovation in Bitcoin is not solely defined by the number or frequency of soft forks. The argument that Bitcoin is lagging because it isn't continually implementing soft forks misrepresents how genuine, sustainable innovation occurs. Such misunderstandings comes from a fiat, centralized mindset and the less credence we give to this assumption, the better off we'll be.

šŸ’Æ

nostr:note1xmjecrus807ekt56acnz9xv8ljp3j6kc2sk47j6677tc9mukshts6m0s4u

Gm Plebs, rise and grind! Stay humble and stack says today. No one can hold you back but yourself.

#gm #plebchain #riseandgrind #grownostr

Without a doubt! The rest just lack a few small things, but they seem to make a huge difference.

I'll never take it for granted again! šŸ‘Š Missed you #amethyst

Same. I'm now bouncing between #Plebstr #Coracle #Satelite #Snort and #Primal trying to find a suitable temporary replacement.

Wake me up when #Amethyst is working again 😓 #gn

Mine went down last night. It seems to behave appropriately some of the time, but I believe it's an amethyst issue and is being investigated.

iirc, they're just large chunks of data run through a machine learning algorithm to produce whatever results. In the case of fomostr, just "hot" posts from your feed. Nothing too special imo, but perhaps they'll be a way for users to get functionality that their client doesn't support.

Maybe not so much stupid as just ignorant. I think a lot of people in this space are still new to the concept, and even more foreign to the concept of how absolutely wretched banks are. They need education.