humanscript is an inferpreter. A script interpreter that infers commands from natural language using AI. There is no predefined syntax, humanscripts just say what they want to happen, and when you execute them, it happens.
https://github.com/lukechilds/humanscript
This is a humanscript called tidy-screenshots. It takes an unorganised directory of screenshots and organises them into directories based on the month the screenshot was taken.
It can be executed like any other script.
https://void.cat/d/Rf3GkVQbCtg6NSfzUndkou.webp
The LLM inferpreted the humanscript into the following bash script at runtime.
https://void.cat/d/Br86EpyZev12HtsxtYka3i.webp
The code is streamed out of the LLM during inferpretation and executed line by line so execution is not blocked waiting for inference to finish. The generated code is cached on first run and will be executed instantly on subsequent runs, bypassing the need for reinferpretation.
https://void.cat/d/CCLBU6ZNWq5bXnioMGkkcB.webp
The humanscript inferpreter supports a wide range of LLM backends. It can be used with cloud hosted LLMs like OpenAI's GTP-3.5 and GPT-4 or locally running open source LLMs like Llama 2.
You can run humanscript in a sandboxed Docker environment with a single command if you want to have a play.
https://github.com/lukechilds/humanscript#install-humanscript
Afaik fedi is developing fedimints in a primary capacity
Basically allows communities to roll their own trust networks and offers some privacy benefits within that network.
Block reports 5.5 billion q2 revenue, 2.4 of that from BTC. Trending up.
Coinbase reports 663 million. Trending down.
"How you do one thing is how you do all things"
"Hold yourself to account"
"Put in a full effort"
"Be Diligent"
"What's your solution"
"What's your goal, focus on your goal"
https://decrypt.co/117221/senator-warren-crypto-bill-kyc-self-custody-wallets
This new bill has some strange language. Essentially will require validators, so nodes/miners, to KYC. My question is, if this goes into place, is it even possible to enforce. Could the state mandate that miners KYC? I know they could not get control of the network, but if they forced a software update, such as a BIP, that included KYC and miners complied, would other nodes (such as mine running on umbrel) have to upgrade software to include KYC info or risk forking? I admit a general lack of understanding on this, so would like to hear from those who do understand.
I think it's just very difficult to "force a sw update" on Bitcoin. So hard to enforce. Likely the mandated sw would be the fork to die, not the status quo existing sw.
I hear that google doesn't prioritize backwards compatibility in their cloud offerings.
It's not private, just psudeonomous
Check out nostr.band
Should tell you
There is a hacker news bot on nostr you may like nostr:npub1s9c53smfq925qx6fgkqgw8as2e99l2hmj32gz0hjjhe8q67fxdvs3ga9je
The market will decide.
gn