Always has been, always will be 😉

But also run your own node 🌹

nevent1qqsretvyu56zdlvd8v8aqchc85vl5y8k6xtt60swa2x2wfud0zr9sacnkqzhf

Create a mining pool with your friends 😘

nevent1qqstukeytlwr8mvqnt0w5n5g8nssstsfg0r99l4j2t4csx8tpv8ymvqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgz80qxe

🍄 🍄‍🟫 🍄

put on the pit vipers anon

What the internet wanted: hot crypto girls

What the internet got: hot crypto girls but also Spinelli from the cartoon, ‘Recess’

The men that work at my local supermercado trust me so much that they now just hand me gloves to serve myself when I walk in

This feels like the win of a lifetime 🚀

Idealistic coders… do you guys see how much they hate builders yet?

nevent1qqsdm5n5dm9ljfvfd5ppvjvht2q6xs6cf0wv2fdsec9s6akenaq2yds5et3wq

this argument is actually one of the most meaningful technical conversations in awhile and it has truly illuminated who is who

Exactly, no we really just want a restaurant that is honest that it is full of flour as it was intended to be by design

And if you like gluten free food, there’s probably other options out there but this might not be it ya know

I do think the option of having the menu gives the people cosplaying a sense of “I’m eating gluten free” even though they are not during sync

Dankon! This is my favorite yet ♥️

I like this filter metaphor so leaving here for my own reuse

nevent1qqsdmpqj35p8pwezq62z2e3eyeqkjk0xgx3dld6rgrakcvz3k8ch84gpzemhxue69uhkvet9v3ejumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgl8cywn

First you and I are ultimately in agreement here but I think a less confusing metaphor would be

It’s like going to a restaurant that can make anything as long as it follows food safety laws (consensus)

If you’re a miner, you literally have access to the kitchen and say over what gets made altogether- because you purchased the ingredients and run the show

Standardness on nodes is like the restaurant saying “we have a menu because it makes our kitchen run smoothly” (but technically if you are the kitchen staff you’re not limited) as a customer you are limited but you could also put in a special order it just might get messed up or slow or expensive or something (out of band tx)

And if you’re running knots you’re saying “I’m gluten free- gluten anywhere near me will make me die please only serve me very gluten free food” but you’re in a restaraunt full of things made from flour so while they might say “this is gluten free” it’s probably not

I did read a really good article about the problems regarding BIP 47 etc I didn’t know how that all played out though so again appreciate :)

Thank you for clarifying! I have very little knowledge about knots so I do appreciate people filling in the gaps for others :)

My frens on nostr: be completely anon or die

My friend on Instagram who is possibly one of the most famous motocross racers walking the planet: posts his email directly on Instagram 😂 and when I comment about it he tells me to email him

Life is absurdly beautiful and humorous

Interesting… I don’t think it’s running on the relays I’m using 🤔

Op_Tuah currently in the works my friend

V true

Knots is safer because it limits bytes to I think like 42… also double check that because I’m going off of memory right now… it’s too late for me to be double checking my work rn 😅 but it’s small

I respect Luke because Luke is protecting node runners from illegal material

Yeah but consensus still caps the byte limit- otherwise we’d end up with another hard fork which I really don’t think anyone wants

The primary problem is load on nodes… right now our best solution for network load is pruning which is actually quite useful but a lot of people think this is conspiracy because of the potential that pruned data could lack integrity

Nodes are supposed to check and balance miners

But like everyone voting for knots? I’m pretty sure it’s pruned but again I know very little about knots admittedly

And core is also pruned right

Tbh it’s safer for node operators to be running pruned data BUT we need full nodes too for archive to check the miners

I am, admittedly, biased towards mining operations simply because I know far more about that perspective than I do validating nodes

And I admittedly side with what I’m familiar with

The more I think about this the more I’m interested- back in 2018 I knew a few people who were pushing something like this but it was an alt network so I didn’t want to get involved but for btc I kind of love this consideration with the needs of today

2018 it felt… not in demand but nostr has changed things too I think from my own thought paradigm

This is actually intriguing

thank you for sharing

This is the first time I’ve considered this angle

♥️ I figured as much

nostr:nprofile1qqsflquxnjhuleknfccdgczyhjqa6fqgtzef58mt7yhyfm7gcm2nwespz4mhxue69uhksar5wpej7tmwdaejumr0dshsqq22hw has someone calmly explained to you what op returns are? I’m seeing so many confusing conversations on here that I’m thinking it might be getting anxiety ridden for people… and people (a lot of whom are rightfully traumatized from the block size wars) are really blowing things out of proportion

Or maybe their cosplaying I really cannot tell at this point

I thought core wouldn’t push this forward because I didn’t really think there was a demand for removing the limits

I actually personally thing Standardness (that’s human policy implemented on chain to make transactions fit a template kind of) would always shave off- networks are really supposed to be elegant and simple by design, we have code that can create these little defense systems like a human body having an immunity response almost

Some of this stuff is hard to explain in English because it’s just these really small little strings of code that create relay rules for how UTXOs (the bitcoins in your wallet) can be spent

Sorry if I’m making this too simple or too complex- I never know my audience… like I cannot read a room lol ever

Blue eyes, blue skies 🌌

V few things in this world as humbling as 21e8 posting their supercluster

I rlly respect the intelligence of that team